Encore – Type-safe back end framework that generates infra from code
https://github.com/encoredev/encore
#HackerNews #Encore #TypeSafe #Framework #Infra #Code #Generation #Backend
#Tag
Encore – Type-safe back end framework that generates infra from code
https://github.com/encoredev/encore
#HackerNews #Encore #TypeSafe #Framework #Infra #Code #Generation #Backend
heise+ | Framework Laptop 16: Aufrüstbares Gaming-Notebook im Test
Das Verspechen, ein Gaming-Notebook später mit einer besseren GPU aufzurüsten, haben schon mehrere Hersteller gebrochen. Framework hält seines.
heise+ | Framework Laptop 16: Aufrüstbares Gaming-Notebook im Test
Das Verspechen, ein Gaming-Notebook später mit einer besseren GPU aufzurüsten, haben schon mehrere Hersteller gebrochen. Framework hält seines.
Hephaestus – Autonomous Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework
https://github.com/Ido-Levi/Hephaestus
#HackerNews #Hephaestus #Multi-Agent #Orchestration #Autonomous #Framework #AI #Development
The future is now...
After a repair of an old Sony #Walkman (replaced the battery as it wouldn't turn on unless connected to USB anymore and wouldn't charge) I found out my #Fairphone 3 connected through a #Framework expansion card can also access it.
Because why shouldn't it?
Snapchat open-sources Valdi a cross-platform UI framework
https://github.com/Snapchat/Valdi
#HackerNews #Snapchat #Valdi #open-source #UI #framework #cross-platform #technology
Ribir: Non-intrusive GUI framework for Rust/WASM
https://github.com/RibirX/Ribir
#HackerNews #Ribir #Rust #WASM #GUI #framework #NonIntrusive #OpenSource
I wrote a post about DHH fash speedrun and crashout.
DHH and Omarchy: Midlife crisis
https://blogs.gnome.org/alatiera/2025/11/06/dhh-and-omarchy-midlife-crisis/
Crush Fascism.
I wrote a post about DHH fash speedrun and crashout.
DHH and Omarchy: Midlife crisis
https://blogs.gnome.org/alatiera/2025/11/06/dhh-and-omarchy-midlife-crisis/
Crush Fascism.
We are Tommi and Fraxinas, Framework Linux Community Ambassadors since September 2024.
We apprehensively followed the developments and the debate concerning Framework’s endorsement and support of Omarchy. We have no direct experience with this Linux distribution, its community, nor with the political environment around it. We did not speak up before now because learning about all of it and keeping up with all the commentary would have been a full-time job. Unfortunately we do not have the time to read every single comment on the dedicated forum thread.
Despite our admittedly limited and superficial understanding of this matter, we believe we have witnessed and read enough to make an informed decision and take a clear position.
The statements from Framework and from Nirav Patel (its CEO) made it very clear for us that Framework is not a company we feel represented by any more, and surely not a company that we want to represent as Ambassadors.
To be frank, it is not even necessary to dive into the petty drama about the recent events in order to provide an explanation of our decision. We are deeply disappointed by a company that is self-proclaimed as the resistance of the tech industry, the good David that intends to stand against the big tech Goliaths that are devouring it. Framework’s behaviour brought to surface an embarrassing and absurd inability to take an explicitly political position, blinded by the Western patriarchal narrative that technology in itself is not political. By trying to keep everyone happy (or at least not to make anyone mad) inside a fictitious “big tent”, the company proved to be no better than any of its Silicon Valley peers, dismissing comments about DHH, and comments about fascism and racism as not strictly related to the main mission.
We were proud to be ambassadors because we believed that Framework not only made products that empowered those who purchase them to fully own and repair their devices, but most importantly because we wrongly expected that this would imply changing the paradigm and the narrative about tech companies altogether.
We were offered the possibility of having a 1:1 conversation with Nirav Patel. We did not take it, because it is self-evident that our opinions are in contrast with the statements that he already made. Too bad, Framework is going to lose much more business than it would have if it simply acknowledged a mistake, took a deep inward look, and questioned its own values and stance.
In a world that is burning, thorn by conflict and greed, it is not enough to be “less evil”, to be radical only in some cases, and be moderate in others. We wanted to be ambassadors of a company that does not see fascism and proprietary software as two distant topics, but that recognised the entanglement of politics and technology, of capitalism and authoritarianism. It seems that this is not the case.
Farewell, Framework. We will miss the shining brave idea we had of you.
The following statement was cross-posted on Framework’s Community Forum.
#Framework #politicalTechnology #SiliconValley #CalifornianIdeology
@frameworkcomputer was considered, but fell short:
❌ Price & spec didn't match
❌ ☑️ Sustainability is a bit of a ruse; components can only purchased at #Framework & replacement boards are expensive; ✅ Still easier todo diy repairs
❌ US company, hardware is manufactured by Taiwan Compal Elec though
❌ VC capital funded
❌ Questionable handling of sponsorships
❌ Promoting Omarchy - distro by extreme rightwing techbro David Heinemeier Hansson
I prefer small cosy tents ⛺
We are Tommi and Fraxinas, Framework Linux Community Ambassadors since September 2024.
We apprehensively followed the developments and the debate concerning Framework’s endorsement and support of Omarchy. We have no direct experience with this Linux distribution, its community, nor with the political environment around it. We did not speak up before now because learning about all of it and keeping up with all the commentary would have been a full-time job. Unfortunately we do not have the time to read every single comment on the dedicated forum thread.
Despite our admittedly limited and superficial understanding of this matter, we believe we have witnessed and read enough to make an informed decision and take a clear position.
The statements from Framework and from Nirav Patel (its CEO) made it very clear for us that Framework is not a company we feel represented by any more, and surely not a company that we want to represent as Ambassadors.
To be frank, it is not even necessary to dive into the petty drama about the recent events in order to provide an explanation of our decision. We are deeply disappointed by a company that is self-proclaimed as the resistance of the tech industry, the good David that intends to stand against the big tech Goliaths that are devouring it. Framework’s behaviour brought to surface an embarrassing and absurd inability to take an explicitly political position, blinded by the Western patriarchal narrative that technology in itself is not political. By trying to keep everyone happy (or at least not to make anyone mad) inside a fictitious “big tent”, the company proved to be no better than any of its Silicon Valley peers, dismissing comments about DHH, and comments about fascism and racism as not strictly related to the main mission.
We were proud to be ambassadors because we believed that Framework not only made products that empowered those who purchase them to fully own and repair their devices, but most importantly because we wrongly expected that this would imply changing the paradigm and the narrative about tech companies altogether.
We were offered the possibility of having a 1:1 conversation with Nirav Patel. We did not take it, because it is self-evident that our opinions are in contrast with the statements that he already made. Too bad, Framework is going to lose much more business than it would have if it simply acknowledged a mistake, took a deep inward look, and questioned its own values and stance.
In a world that is burning, thorn by conflict and greed, it is not enough to be “less evil”, to be radical only in some cases, and be moderate in others. We wanted to be ambassadors of a company that does not see fascism and proprietary software as two distant topics, but that recognised the entanglement of politics and technology, of capitalism and authoritarianism. It seems that this is not the case.
Farewell, Framework. We will miss the shining brave idea we had of you.
The following statement was cross-posted on Framework’s Community Forum.
#Framework #politicalTechnology #SiliconValley #CalifornianIdeology
@tommi @fraxinas My girlfriend @Azarilh mentioned framework to me before. Honestly I'm not into tech so I don't really understand what's going on.... but my understanding is Framework is defending/supporting DHH, who is anti-immigrant and supports a dude who got a restraining order from using shitter (formerly Twitter) after making hateful anti-queer posts.
All that being said, I think the two of you made the right call. At first, I thought it was a matter of "please no politics in tech" which is an unfortunate sentiment expressed by furries, but not something that I'd cancel someone over. But if they're actually donating money to bigots, then that's another story.
It's a tricky situation, because I think a lot of big tech companies make unethical decisions. But until Framework changes their position on the subject, I wouldn't support them either. Also, it feels like Framework didn't really do a good job of looking into DHH's political views. Pinning all the blame on the community instead of the creator (DHH) is a bit of a yikes. Not saying the community isn't bad (idk enough about the subject), but DHH should also be held accountable for his actions.
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate