@je5perl That's what I thought, so essentially the privacy of a user's device is in the hands of?
I mean, I assume we're talking the very corporations that specialise in violating privacy because it makes them money.
 
If this is a win, I don't understand something.
#ChatControl
@happyborg No service provider is doing voluntary detection for end-to-end encrypted services, whereas the proposed mandatory scheme would apply to #E2EE services as well (forcing them to implement client-side scanning).
This is the big difference. It's not the ideal outcome, I fully agree about that.
 
      
  
             
      
  
             
      
  
              
           
      
  
             
      
  
               
      
  
             
      
  
             
      
  
             
      
  
             
      
  
              
           
      
  
             
      
  
              
           
  
      
  
            