En.osm.town is an independent Mastodon server for people active in the OpenStreetMap community.
This server has been operating since 2018.
You can find out more at https://en.osm.town/about or contact the admin @compass
#FeaturedServer#OpenStreetMap#OSM#Geospatial#GIS#Maps#Mapping#Cartography#Mastodon #Fediverse#FreeFediverse
OpenStreetMap.org now has a vector tiles layer. 😍
read more: https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2025/07/22/vector-tiles-are-deployed-on-openstreetmap-org/
#OpenStreetMap #OSM #maps #gischat
Mapa de Cascadia (2023) https://mapasmilhaud.com/mapas-geograficos/mapa-de-cascadia-2023/
"Work in progress" de la carte de l'Oisans que je refais au format 50x70cm, "ça se vend mieux en magasin", on m'a dit. Encore beaucoup de travail...
#alternativemaps #cartography #grenoble #imaginarymaps #maps#QGIS #sealevelrise #thegimp #blender #oisans
Quand la cartographie rejoint l’accessibilité : https://activmap.limos.fr/ (sur Mastodon : @activmap
Le projet de recherche est super intéressant. On est sur de la génération semi-automatique de carte en relief (pour des carrefours) à partir d’OpenStreetMap avec de la vocalisation pour les personnes déficientes visuelles.
Je ne sais pas si le projet continuera après les thèses déjà soutenues en 2024 par contre.
👏
Et pour que les données soient à jour dans OSM pour ce faire... @streetcomplete vous indique où elles manquent près de vous.
An Anciente Mappe of Fairyland by Bernard Sleigh, 1920
If you believe in fairies, this ancient map and guide will help you know them and find them
By Paul Sorene
Fairyland at PG:
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/subject/37291
Une étude critique de la discipline « Histoire de la cartographie »
🔸 "Le domaine apparemment séculaire de « l'histoire de la cartographie » a été inventé après 1950"
Par Matthew Edney @mhedney
https://brill.com/display/title/73079
#histoire #cartographie #maps #cartography #livre#géographie#étude #essai #recherche#Brill
We all know, how crappy the common #Mercator projection for world #maps represents areas, inflating them with distance from the equator.
What many people don't know, is why this projection is still so popular:
The shortest path between two points on the globe, is a straight line on the map.
I reckon, this is useful.
In all other projections, the shortest paths are curves.
In #Maths, we say, the Mercator projection preserves angles, not areas.
There's been talk on the Fedi about why online maps like OSM and Google use the Mercator projection, and I think it needs a bit of clarification. (Do NOT snitch tag.)
Online maps are mostly used at small scales, of a district or a city. At these scales, the earth is approximately flat, so users expect a map that is conformal, one that preserves angles and shapes.
Online maps are continuously zoomable from continents down to your house. They usually aren't rendered on your browser straight from vectors, but are batch-rendered offline into square tile images. If you're on a slowish Internet connection, you can see them loading individually.
As you zoom an online map, tiles get replaced with higher-resolution ones, and as you scroll, tiles get filled in to fill the gaps. You could theoretically scroll and zoom forever, so the map needs to not have a magically special reference latitude or longitude. These constrains mean that the map needs to be equatorial, so that no point gets special treatment, and cylindrical, so that meridians are vertical and lines of latitude are horizontal.
And which is the map projection that is all of equatorial, cylindrical and conformal? Mercator!
There's been talk on the Fedi about why online maps like OSM and Google use the Mercator projection, and I think it needs a bit of clarification. (Do NOT snitch tag.)
Online maps are mostly used at small scales, of a district or a city. At these scales, the earth is approximately flat, so users expect a map that is conformal, one that preserves angles and shapes.
Online maps are continuously zoomable from continents down to your house. They usually aren't rendered on your browser straight from vectors, but are batch-rendered offline into square tile images. If you're on a slowish Internet connection, you can see them loading individually.
As you zoom an online map, tiles get replaced with higher-resolution ones, and as you scroll, tiles get filled in to fill the gaps. You could theoretically scroll and zoom forever, so the map needs to not have a magically special reference latitude or longitude. These constrains mean that the map needs to be equatorial, so that no point gets special treatment, and cylindrical, so that meridians are vertical and lines of latitude are horizontal.
And which is the map projection that is all of equatorial, cylindrical and conformal? Mercator!
Mercator's world map of 1569 was useful to navigators at the time because it is conformal (preserving angles) even over long distances. You could draw a line between source and destination, read off the constant bearing, and point your ship in that direction for days or weeks, and you'd arrive at your destination. This line is called a "rhumb line", or (and I love this word) a "loxodrome".
Rhumb lines are absolutely not the shortest route between two points. That would be a great circle route, but computing a great circle requires spherical trigonometry, which is something that navigators were loath to mess with (as your bearing changes over the course of traversing a great circle, so it requires constant attention). Great circles have certainly been used by navigators for a long time, particularly in aviation where carrying your fuel is a factor. Now of course, ubiquitous computing and GPS makes great circles easy, and rhumb lines are just a historical curiosity.
But because of the properties of Mercator being coincidentally convenient for online maps, we find ourselves back in the 16th Century with a default projection that is frankly bad at large scales.
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate
