Discussion
Loading...

#Tag

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de  ·  activity timestamp last week

The #Philosophy dept. at @MontclairState will consolidate into a new "School of Human Narrative and Creative Expression" with #English and #Spanish?

And #Psychology will consolidate too?

No more departments (or dept. chairs)? 🤔

https://www.northjersey.com/story/news/education/2025/12/01/montclair-state-university-humanities-rebrand/87459471007/

#higherEd #philSci #edu

NorthJersey.com

Montclair State's rebrand of the humanities has faculty miffed

Faculty and students at Montclair State University are alarmed by a restructuring move that will eliminate humanities departments.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de  ·  activity timestamp last week

If a statistical test always gets produces the same result and if its results are often (usually?) described fallaciously, should the test be abandoned?

If so, we may need to abandon p-curve analysis:

https://replicationindex.com/2026/01/03/what-a-decade-of-p-curve-analyses-tells-us-about-false-positive-psychology/

#stats #psychology #philSci #metascience #sciComm

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

#AI may exacerbate bad academic habits:

Science summaries from large language models ( #LLMs) were nearly five times more likely than human-authored summaries to contain broad generalizations (95% CI [3.06, 7.70], p < 0.001).

And newer language models over-generalized more; not less!

https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241776

#sciComm #philSci #metascience #logic #edu #academia

Generalization bias in large language model summarization of scientific research

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
Nick Byrd, Ph.D.
@ByrdNick@nerdculture.de  ·  activity timestamp last month

RE: https://mastodon.acm.org/@neilernst/115607469843033537

😳 The #AI survey taker "rendered [attention quality] checks [ACQs] effectively obsolete. Across 6,000 total trials..., [it] committed only 10 errors, achieving an overall pass rate of 99.8% and scoring perfectly on 18 of the 20 ACQ types."

#surveyMethods #psychometrics #psychology #tech #psychology #philSci #SciComm #dataQuality

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Yogi Jaeger
Yogi Jaeger
@yoginho@spore.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

I've finished the first draft of my paper about William Wimsatt and his multi-perspectival realism.

I think every practicing scientist today should know about his philosophy. It will make you a better researcher, I guarantee. And it will help you feel more comfortable exploring the structure of a messy and imperfect world without losing track of your limitations.

#philsci #science #philosophy #perspectivism

Re-Engineering Wimsatt for Limited Beings
Johannes Jaeger

Abstract
Science is the best way to get a robust grip on reality. The best, at least, that limited human beings have devised so far. Yet, not even scientists quite seem to understand how scientific knowledge is produced. This is not only a philosophical but also a practical problem, as our misunderstandings affect the quality of our research and limit the directions it can take. In light of this, it may be good if we reflected a bit more on how we do science — to become better researchers through philosophy. Here, I provide an accessible introduction to a philosophical approach that achieves precisely this: William Wimsatt’s multi-perspectival realism. It disabuses us of widespread but misleading myths and idealizations concerning science, such as the idea that it can approach a “view from nowhere” — complete and objectively detached knowledge of the world. Wismatt proposes an alternative view based on his thorough studies of actual research practice. It cuts deeply into the layered yet messy structure of reality, and the improvised but potent tools we have available, as limited intelligences, to explore it. Wimsatt reframes science as an irregular yet adaptive process rather than a cumulative repository of unchangeable facts. His philosophy provides a workable and grounded middle way between constructivist relativism and objectivist realism.
Re-Engineering Wimsatt for Limited Beings Johannes Jaeger Abstract Science is the best way to get a robust grip on reality. The best, at least, that limited human beings have devised so far. Yet, not even scientists quite seem to understand how scientific knowledge is produced. This is not only a philosophical but also a practical problem, as our misunderstandings affect the quality of our research and limit the directions it can take. In light of this, it may be good if we reflected a bit more on how we do science — to become better researchers through philosophy. Here, I provide an accessible introduction to a philosophical approach that achieves precisely this: William Wimsatt’s multi-perspectival realism. It disabuses us of widespread but misleading myths and idealizations concerning science, such as the idea that it can approach a “view from nowhere” — complete and objectively detached knowledge of the world. Wismatt proposes an alternative view based on his thorough studies of actual research practice. It cuts deeply into the layered yet messy structure of reality, and the improvised but potent tools we have available, as limited intelligences, to explore it. Wimsatt reframes science as an irregular yet adaptive process rather than a cumulative repository of unchangeable facts. His philosophy provides a workable and grounded middle way between constructivist relativism and objectivist realism.
Re-Engineering Wimsatt for Limited Beings Johannes Jaeger Abstract Science is the best way to get a robust grip on reality. The best, at least, that limited human beings have devised so far. Yet, not even scientists quite seem to understand how scientific knowledge is produced. This is not only a philosophical but also a practical problem, as our misunderstandings affect the quality of our research and limit the directions it can take. In light of this, it may be good if we reflected a bit more on how we do science — to become better researchers through philosophy. Here, I provide an accessible introduction to a philosophical approach that achieves precisely this: William Wimsatt’s multi-perspectival realism. It disabuses us of widespread but misleading myths and idealizations concerning science, such as the idea that it can approach a “view from nowhere” — complete and objectively detached knowledge of the world. Wismatt proposes an alternative view based on his thorough studies of actual research practice. It cuts deeply into the layered yet messy structure of reality, and the improvised but potent tools we have available, as limited intelligences, to explore it. Wimsatt reframes science as an irregular yet adaptive process rather than a cumulative repository of unchangeable facts. His philosophy provides a workable and grounded middle way between constructivist relativism and objectivist realism.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Ulrike Hahn boosted
Dimitri Coelho Mollo
Dimitri Coelho Mollo
@dcm@social.sunet.se  ·  activity timestamp 8 months ago

An updated and improved version of the paper briefly summarised in the thread above has now been published open access on Theoria:

https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.25837

Link to the thread: https://social.sunet.se/@dcm/111772379106183358

#philAI #philsci #ai

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Dimitri Coelho Mollo
Dimitri Coelho Mollo
@dcm@social.sunet.se  ·  activity timestamp 8 months ago

An updated and improved version of the paper briefly summarised in the thread above has now been published open access on Theoria:

https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.25837

Link to the thread: https://social.sunet.se/@dcm/111772379106183358

#philAI #philsci #ai

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct