2) But no context and no scientific information is provided directly by Burioni: following the link to his personal website within the tweet, the scienific knowledge is HIDDEN BEHIND A PAYWALL.
My fear is that the alarm generated by the legal news without scientific published on the Twitter account of Burioni with 342K followers could have been greater than the reassurance provided to the ones willing to pay for it, which presumably already agree with Burioni.
See https://burioni.substack.com/p/il-vaccino-a-mrna-contro-il-covid
AFAIK this is the first known case of "celebrity scientist" making profit of scientific popularization, which can be a counterproductive #scicomm strategy where the risk is to polarize the content of the scientists around the paying audience, confirming the prejudices and biases of anti-vaxxers regarding the alleged economic interests that drive virologists to promote vaccines, casting the entire scientific community under the shadow of a single and questionable online business initiative.