@marsroverdriver @mekkaokereke It's worth noting that most of these guys were plenty rich when Obama was president and most of them were giving money to charities and giving speeches about how diversity makes us strong, because that's what going along to get along looked like when sane people were running the country.

@mekkaokereke @matildalove LeBron earned his wealth by working, not exploiting workers in a company he owned.

@mekkaokereke

I can’t help but agree with you, but I also know the scientific evidence demonstrates that wealth grants them impunity to act on their sentiments. The super wealthy also have their country club of cultish ideas. They can speak to each other and amplify each other while pointing to their money as proof of their cognitive elite status.

Fundamentally, you are correct, because the elitism is built in

@mekkaokereke The #revolutions in #France and #Russia proved that there’s no such thing as ‘untouchable #wealth.’ Just saying.

#Histodons #resist with #ElbowsUp 💪.

@mekkaokereke

Dolly Parton just died and we can't get enough of talking about how she used her wealth and her influence to help those in need. She did it quietly and consistently.

She also changed her opinions on things when she learned more about them.

All that without once publicly donating a million dollars to an authoritarian fascist.

Money doesn't make you evil. The love of money over people might make you greedy and selfish, but it won't necessarily make you fascist.

These mugs were always pieces of shit and our culture rewarded it over and over.

@mekkaokereke it’s also like the Nazi bad effect in tech. They didn’t say anything when the fascists showed up. Then anyone with antifascists tendencies got pushed out.

@mekkaokereke
Yeah I think the better angle from anticapitalists/anarchists is that if a position with such unchallengeable power exists, there will always be the possibility that the person in that position will be a piece of shit, and that alone is reason enough to not have positions of unchallengeable power, because no mechanism of making sure people in that position are decent people will ever be perfect, and it only takes one bad apple to wreck everything for decades if not centuries to come, and abusive people will always be drawn to positions where they can do the most abuse.
It's a systems vulnerability thing, not an issue of changing individual beliefs

@mekkaokereke extreme wealth seems to amplify already held beliefs.

There's no longer a need to confirm or mask when that wealthy and the emotional draw of power leads to maximizing those beliefs via the power.

Which is why Scott, French, James, Newmark become massive engines for social good -- they couldn't be that before the extreme wealth.