alcinnz
alcinnz boosted
@alcinnz #clojure. Had a lot of fun coding backend and frontend in the same language, saved a lot of time in implementation & struggling with newer syntax. #Lisp made functional programming digestible for me. Implemented my own web framework piecing together different libraries with a new glue. All of which I wouldn't have done with Python or Go. 10/10
@alcinnz #clojure. Had a lot of fun coding backend and frontend in the same language, saved a lot of time in implementation & struggling with newer syntax. #Lisp made functional programming digestible for me. Implemented my own web framework piecing together different libraries with a new glue. All of which I wouldn't have done with Python or Go. 10/10
https://screwlisp.small-web.org/emacs/writing-experience/

My #emacs #writing #writingExperience #emacsCarnival submission.

Discussing my transition to #eev away from being a heavy user of the popular #orgmode.

My writing primarily concerns #lisp #programming, so the difference between #eepitch and #orgBabel features heavily.

Looking forward to hearing from everyone including the other emacs carnivalians.

CC @greg (Writing Experience emacs carnival host)

https://screwlisp.small-web.org/emacs/writing-experience/

My #emacs #writing #writingExperience #emacsCarnival submission.

Discussing my transition to #eev away from being a heavy user of the popular #orgmode.

My writing primarily concerns #lisp #programming, so the difference between #eepitch and #orgBabel features heavily.

Looking forward to hearing from everyone including the other emacs carnivalians.

CC @greg (Writing Experience emacs carnival host)

alcinnz
alcinnz boosted

Unpopular opinion: Classic Lisp/Scheme isn't a great first programming language.[1]

When I learned Lisp in school I was incredibly confused by the difference between functional programming in the sense of passing functions and creating macros.

That key distinction and difference is important, and the homoiconicity[3] of Lisp made that distinction less clear than it needed to be.

Teach Scheme second or third if you like, not first.

#Lisp#Scheme#CompterScience#ComputerProgramming

[1] No I'm not talking about LOGO.[2]

[2] If LOGO was your first programming language (it was mine) then you're old.

[3] This is the Fediverse and now I'm sure someone is going to change their username to"Homoiconicity"

Unpopular opinion: Classic Lisp/Scheme isn't a great first programming language.[1]

When I learned Lisp in school I was incredibly confused by the difference between functional programming in the sense of passing functions and creating macros.

That key distinction and difference is important, and the homoiconicity[3] of Lisp made that distinction less clear than it needed to be.

Teach Scheme second or third if you like, not first.

#Lisp#Scheme#CompterScience#ComputerProgramming

[1] No I'm not talking about LOGO.[2]

[2] If LOGO was your first programming language (it was mine) then you're old.

[3] This is the Fediverse and now I'm sure someone is going to change their username to"Homoiconicity"

alcinnz
alcinnz boosted

Installing lisp for beginners.

https://screwlisp.small-web.org/fundamental/installing-lisp-etc/

So much computing is predicated on having this or a conscious alternative decision to it. Here is my attempt to help beginners get this far. What do you think?

#commonLisp #emacs #beginners #lisp #programming #setup #software #developer

I realize this is broad but can anyone recommend advanced Common #lisp books/resources? And by "advanced" I mean the nitty gritty of pro quality software, REPL tricks, how to profile/monitor/deploy/manage packages/FFI calls etc. I've read PCL and PAIP so I have a modest grasp of the language itself.

I'm sticking with SBCL for now.