This year, I am really feeling the extra pain introduced by bullshit generators, aka "AI", when it comes to evaluating research assignments. I keep second guessing whether things have actually been written by certain students or not. Especially those who've talked to me about how they've been using "AI" for their other projects. Le sigh 馃珷

To reduce the extra burden of checking whether the cited references actually exist or not (thanks no thanks "AI"!), I have made it mandatory for the students to add all their references to a Zotero group library. It's been so helpful! Highly recommend this

@academicchatter

#AcademicChatter

This year, I am really feeling the extra pain introduced by bullshit generators, aka "AI", when it comes to evaluating research assignments. I keep second guessing whether things have actually been written by certain students or not. Especially those who've talked to me about how they've been using "AI" for their other projects. Le sigh 馃珷

To reduce the extra burden of checking whether the cited references actually exist or not (thanks no thanks "AI"!), I have made it mandatory for the students to add all their references to a Zotero group library. It's been so helpful! Highly recommend this

@academicchatter

#AcademicChatter

The latest FOSS Academic post involves more wrestling with the implications of #generativeAI for academic peer review:

https://fossacademic.tech/2025/08/06/reviewing-ai.html

In this post, I take observations from software #developers and #openSource podcasters (such as the folks at @latenightlinux ) about how genAI is swamping things like bug bounties and code reviews. This is similar to some of the issues faced by academic peer reviewers.

#academicchatter#FOSSacademic

Yesterday the UC Berkeley Department of Linguistics announced that Robin Lakoff, a professor there from 1972 to 2012, has died. I really loved Robin's pragmatics class in grad school. She taught us so much about pragmatics, the history of linguistics, and various other stuff. Partly I thought she was amazing because she was a deeply shy, reclusive person, but she was hilarious in class. And her jokes weren't re-used, they were timely to current events. One thing I learned from her is that lecture can be a performance, like theater. Another important thing I learned from her was from sort of an aside during one lecture: a field can keep expanding the set of questions that are considered reasonable to ask, and this is good. A question that comes across as silly and uninformed, like no actual linguist would ask that, might be a reasonable topic for inquiry 10 years later. She explained how a lot of the questions we were doing research on in the 90's were not considered questions a linguist should ask back when she was in grad school in the 60's or 70's, but by the 90's there were whole conferences on the same questions. Like the kind of questions where the rest of the class might giggle uncomfortably, and your professor would try to steer you back onto something reasonable. That one little aside during a lecture comes back to me often. She also taught us Gricean maxims and conversational implicature and presupposition, in ways that just astounded me sometimes. I only took one class with her and she was never on my committees or things like that, but I really appreciated her and have thought of her often. #linguistics#AcademicChatter

Yesterday the UC Berkeley Department of Linguistics announced that Robin Lakoff, a professor there from 1972 to 2012, has died. I really loved Robin's pragmatics class in grad school. She taught us so much about pragmatics, the history of linguistics, and various other stuff. Partly I thought she was amazing because she was a deeply shy, reclusive person, but she was hilarious in class. And her jokes weren't re-used, they were timely to current events. One thing I learned from her is that lecture can be a performance, like theater. Another important thing I learned from her was from sort of an aside during one lecture: a field can keep expanding the set of questions that are considered reasonable to ask, and this is good. A question that comes across as silly and uninformed, like no actual linguist would ask that, might be a reasonable topic for inquiry 10 years later. She explained how a lot of the questions we were doing research on in the 90's were not considered questions a linguist should ask back when she was in grad school in the 60's or 70's, but by the 90's there were whole conferences on the same questions. Like the kind of questions where the rest of the class might giggle uncomfortably, and your professor would try to steer you back onto something reasonable. That one little aside during a lecture comes back to me often. She also taught us Gricean maxims and conversational implicature and presupposition, in ways that just astounded me sometimes. I only took one class with her and she was never on my committees or things like that, but I really appreciated her and have thought of her often. #linguistics#AcademicChatter

The latest FOSS Academic post involves more wrestling with the implications of #generativeAI for academic peer review:

https://fossacademic.tech/2025/08/06/reviewing-ai.html

In this post, I take observations from software #developers and #openSource podcasters (such as the folks at @latenightlinux ) about how genAI is swamping things like bug bounties and code reviews. This is similar to some of the issues faced by academic peer reviewers.

#academicchatter#FOSSacademic

If you assume a 50% reproducibility rate (results from reproducibility projects vary from 12-61%), the line of irreproducible articles would be just below the "all articles" line in the logarithmic plot.
Just as a comparison to the red "paper mill products" line...

https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.2420092122

https://retractionwatch.com/2025/08/04/fighting-coordinated-publication-fraud-is-like-emptying-an-overflowing-bathtub-with-a-spoon-study-coauthor-says/#comment-2344111

#academicchatter

If you鈥檙e an @ICAHDQ member (especially the Comm Law & Policy division), please consider nominating yourself or someone you admire for our upcoming elections.

Three open positions: (1) Secretary; (2) Student and Early Career Representative; (3) International Liaison.

Deadline for nominations is this Friday, August 8th.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aramsinnreich_ica26-activity-7358136424732237824-cdvs

#academia#academicChatter #commodon

If you鈥檙e an @ICAHDQ member (especially the Comm Law & Policy division), please consider nominating yourself or someone you admire for our upcoming elections.

Three open positions: (1) Secretary; (2) Student and Early Career Representative; (3) International Liaison.

Deadline for nominations is this Friday, August 8th.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/aramsinnreich_ica26-activity-7358136424732237824-cdvs

#academia#academicChatter #commodon

As we hear more about publishers not doing a good enough job of editing and factchecking, and even turning things over to AI, it seems to me it's a good time for experienced scientists to share which journals in their field they still trust to show the kind of academic rigor and integrity we should expect of academic publishing.

Please reply with which journal/s in your field you still respect, and why.

@plantscience @academicchatter#Publishing#Science#AcademicChatter

As we hear more about publishers not doing a good enough job of editing and factchecking, and even turning things over to AI, it seems to me it's a good time for experienced scientists to share which journals in their field they still trust to show the kind of academic rigor and integrity we should expect of academic publishing.

Please reply with which journal/s in your field you still respect, and why.

@plantscience @academicchatter#Publishing#Science#AcademicChatter

As we hear more about publishers not doing a good enough job of editing and factchecking, and even turning things over to AI, it seems to me it's a good time for experienced scientists to share which journals in their field they still trust to show the kind of academic rigor and integrity we should expect of academic publishing.

Please reply with which journal/s in your field you still respect, and why.

@plantscience @academicchatter#Publishing#Science#AcademicChatter

Alex, the Hearth Fire
Robert W. Gehl
Alex, the Hearth Fire and 1 other boosted

Pleased to announce that my book, Move Slowly and Build Bridges: Mastodon, the Fediverse, and the Struggle for Democratic Social Media, is now available online, and will be out in print in a couple weeks!
https://moveslowlybuildbridges.com
That site has more stuff, too -- links to related articles, some notes about how I researched it, and a contact form in case you want to talk about the fediverse with me! (I'd be happy to chat with journalists about it!)
#academicChatter #bookstodon #fediverse #mastodon

The latest blog posts from the Network of Alternative Social Media Researchers is live! It's a rundown of some of the newest items we've added to our academic bibliography:

https://socialmediaalternatives.org/2025/08/01/new-bib-items.html

The items include analyses of alt-tech and a study of the incomplete Twitter/Mastodon migration.

#alternativeSocialMedia#academicChatter

The latest blog posts from the Network of Alternative Social Media Researchers is live! It's a rundown of some of the newest items we've added to our academic bibliography:

https://socialmediaalternatives.org/2025/08/01/new-bib-items.html

The items include analyses of alt-tech and a study of the incomplete Twitter/Mastodon migration.

#alternativeSocialMedia#academicChatter