This essay in materialist history offers no magic bulle-transition' programme, no emancipating green utopia does show, however, is the danger of basing our visions of on bad history, and the need, if we are ever to hope to mate policy that is even remotely rigorous, for a new und of energy and material dynamics. Once again, the aim is cize renewables or even to show that a transition is imposs time allowed for the 2°C target, the answer would have predictable anyway. I simply wanted to understand strange and strangely consensual future came from. Bo 'atomic age', envisaged as a distant response by rich cou depletion of fossil fuels, 'transition' has been taken up out any serious justification, as a way of thinking abou challenge.