@EUCommission

Feel strongly?

What about... Disagree completely and want it banned from the EU. Datacenters included.

You are making a small bunch of psycopath billionaires even richer. They own several media across the globle, and they use that money to push democratic elections towards right wing parties that will give them everything they want. The EU included.

When you are going to stop feeding your executioners?

@EUCommission
It shouldn’t. Hence “copyright protected”.

@EUCommission

Why hasn’t a single word from the many hundreds of pages of words defining THE COPYRIGHT LAWS THAT ALREADY EXISTS been applied to any of the AI companies yet ?

https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/copyright-legislation

I really try not to be rude on social media but this is a dereliction of the EUs obligations toward copyright holders

Why are you not prosecuting them as I would expect to prosecuted ?

@EUCommission When it’s agreed to by the copyright holder and paid for? Like…copyright has always worked?

(Also: fuuuuuuuu AI for making me defend copyright laws)

@EUCommission individual privacy and copyright rules should be strengthened to limit corporations ability to end civilization.

@EUCommission NO copyrigth-protected content should ever be used for trained AI !!!

@EUCommission
The problem is in your "and more". Europe is quite useless in front of tech-bros abd big pharma... It's sympatic for asking... But...

@EUCommission the form is not in all the languages of the EU and the wording is terrible. Do better, this is an important topic.

@EUCommission

https://link.europa.eu/JbhGpG

403 ERROR
The request could not be satisfied.
Request blocked. We can't connect to the server for this app or website at this time.

Generated by cloudfront (CloudFront)
Request ID: QEwpAI-TDL8NZ1-rpy7dgrHhDs10BaPtVzw09dAL4JIxnagRsRtnkQ==

Want feedback, it seems like that is not the case.....

@EUCommission Simple: If the license allows it. And remember NC means non commercial.

So pay for it or only use free material.

@EUCommission reminder that all comments here have to be included into the EU plateform to be taken into account

@EUCommission

Under what conditions should copyright-protected content be used for AI training?

ONLY WITH EXPRESS PERMISSION AND PAYMENT...

Anything else is theft.

RE: https://ec.social-network.europa.eu/@EUCommission/117381410942959608

[1/2] @EUCommission Europe has already given up, right? Why bother asking?

Many bands around us have used Creative Common licenses, usually BY-NC-SA, for more than 20 years.
Reasons:

BY (attribution right) means that people can copy, download our songs for their own consumption without being bothered by right-holders .

SA (share alike) means that you need to ask for permission to make any derivative work (we have never refused a remix).

..

#music #ai #noai #copyright #law #creativecommons #license #oligarchy #politics #europe
#rights #tech #technology #art #mastoart #libre

@EUCommission the only tolerable conditions are either using content whose license explicitly allows commercial derivative works (public domain, some variants of creative commons but then you also have to comply with the obligation to mention the original author), or obtaining a license for that. As the laws already specify. It's really simple and it's insulting to see governments and institutions think there is any debate.

@EUCommission Two very simple things: CONSENT and MONEY. They have stolen everything. They have destroyed books, stolen art etc. Make them pay and make them accountable for every thing they have stolen. Royalties for everything used and written consent from every artist/author/scientist/etc that have their work stolen and stuff they still want to use. No consent? Then work removed. Cannot be more simple. You would arrest a simple burglar/thief. So why not ai companies and their ownwers/ceo's?