@jackeric @torproject grapheneos is right now the most secure general purpose computing device, and entirely maintains its own hardware and software. you speak with an assumed authority in the replies of the tor project, where you know scared and vulnerable people might see what you write. if you're serious, you need to understand that this an extremely irresponsible thing to do.
i honestly can't find it within me to give you the benefit of the doubt. nihilism won't save anyone, especially if you go so far as to ? associate android and the play store ? your terminology "veto" is the crux of your entire concern, and i have absolutely no clue what you could mean by that.
there is so much more work to do in the middle of wartime than try to neg tor for fucking hiring someone so they can keep people safe. "truly useful" is no true scotsman i think. the people stuck on widely surveilled platforms are not an acceptable casualty!
i have seen people i used to trust plant vulnerabilities in everyone's code, multiple times, this year. there still remain people i trust, like the grapheneos project, to protect users. you are fundamentally mistaken about the critical nature of the situation. when the us goes to war, it does not spare its own citizens.
on the off chance you made a severe error in judgement, the grapheneos project depicts a vision for the future without depending on google. if you waste their time with replies like these—don't.