@feudjais
Quand tu veux vendre sur internet, difficile de ne pas accepter les cartes bancaires.
Donc tu peux demander à une banque un TPE virtuel... mais ça coûte cher.
Donc il existe des services en ligne pour faire les transactions bancaires sans trop payer aux banque. Stripe est l'un deux. Mais comme dit, il tourne mal.
Mollie est une alternative.

Tout cela n'est utile qu'en tant que vendeur.
En tant que particulier, ça ne change rien: tu donnes ton numéro de carte pour payer.

Israeli air attacks on Lebanon kill at least four

@gisellaruccia Se entra l'odio dentro di noi, abbiamo perso.

Masked and hooded hooligans are left alone by the police while they block Dover. Anti-terrorist police raid an 83 year old lady's home after she was arrested for holding a piece of cardboard in protest against the genocide in Palestine.

This is the real two-tier policing.

#UKPolitics
#UKPolice
#TwoTierPolicing
#EverydayFascism

https://www.thepoke.com/2026/09/05/people-are-furiously-calling-out-the-hypocrisy-and-double-standards-around-the-balaclava-wearing-stop-the-boats-protestors-in-dover/

Le premier signe de civilisation dans une culture, c'est quand… Ah pardon j’avais oublié d’allumer mon micro, c’est bon, vous m’entendez ? Donc je disais que le premier signe de la civili… ah ah, c’est mon chat, il aime bien télétravailler, il est beau mon chat ! Vous avez vu mon chat ? Donc bref, cette histoire de culture et de civilisation, je voulais dire… ok, je vais donner des croquettes à la civilisation et je reviens.

@nico I haven’t had the opportunity but I hope I get to someday. I’ve seen Agriculture back in June (it was amazing) and I know they toured with Chat Pile before

@sebsauvage C'est bien comme ça on sait quoi cibler pour tout faire tomber 😎

You Don't Have a Right to Safe Drinking Water, US Court Rules

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2026/09/drinking-water-mississippi-lawsuit/

Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49584637

#HackerNews #drinkingwater #humanrights #courtdecision #mississippi #politics #news

#SilentSunday

@david_chisnall interesting viewpoint. Where would you draw the line here? I mean yea fascists are the low-hanging fruit but what about e.g. convicted criminals that served their time? Child Abusers? Or deep-down MAGA folks? (Though to be fair, they probably already fall under the fascist cluase). I'm not trying to whatabout here, I'm genuinly intrigued by the question whether we can define a clear "red line" if you will as a societal consensus.

@lou_de_sel
Et franchement avec Wero qui se développe, même plus besoin de ce genre d'intermédiaire !

#notesArt #mastoArt #art #illustration #fediArt

@Siph have you seen chat pile live? mighty. also they always seem to have queer/trans/etc bands they bring with them

@sebsauvage quelqu'un·e peut m'expliquer à quoi ça sert tout ça ? Je n'y connais absolument rien genre full-boomer. Quand je paye, j'ai besoin d'une carte et… c'est tout. Stripe c'est quoi ? Un intermédiaire entre le site ou je renseigne ma CB et la banque ?

@tinker la mayor parte de la gente y de las instituciones no van a no usar la IA de manera general. Se podrá criticar su uso en algunos ámbitos y se debe vigilar y fiscalizar a las compañías. Pero querer darle la espalda es simplemente idealismo.

@jonny
I thought the hills were the end of the freeway... Just drive the commuters right into the water.

TIL that nobody knows how to convert nits to lumens properly.

If you search the question, the AI overview is wrong. nits are a unit of brightness per area, so first of all, you need to multiply by screen area (in square meters).

1 nit = 3.426 lm/m² (?)

But where does that constant come from anyway? If you search around, you will find various websites using that number. Others say it is just 1.

Apparently the 3.426 factor has to do with conversion from foot-lamberts... so completely unrelated.

1 nit = 1 cd/m^2. 1 cd = 1 lm/sr. So 1 nit = 1 lm/sr⋅m^2. For a perfectly uniform Lambertian surface, the integral over 180 degrees (the screen only emits forward) works out to π (3.14). So 3.426 is impossibly large.

But of course, real screens aren't uniform emitters. For OLED screens it would be a fairly small factor, since they tend to maintain brightness at steeper angles. LCD screens have much stronger falloff, which depends on the specific technology.

You'd have to integrate the brightness curve for a specific display to arrive at a number. Eyeballing and extrapolating the graphs in the previous link and plugging into Wolfram Alpha, I get around a factor of 2.9 for OLED and 2.2 for IPS, give or take. Probably a lot worse for TN. Take these numbers with a grain of salt, but that's the ballpark.

So, for a screen, lumens = k * nits * area (m² ), where k is in the ballpark of 2.9 for OLED, 2.2 for IPS, and pi ideal.

One of those sunrises that kept getting better by the minute.