🇩🇪EU-Parlament lässt #Chatkontrolle 1.0 trotz Mehrheits‑Nein (314:276) passieren – Massenscans privater Chats bis 2028 erlaubt. Betroffene warnen. Meine Einordnung und warum das der falsche Weg ist 👇
https://www.patrick-breyer.de/eu-parlament-winkt-chatkontrolle-1-0-durch-breyer-wahrer-verlierer-sind-unsere-kinder/
#Demokratiefail
sorry.. ich verstehe die Fragestellung nciht
https://howtheyvote.eu/votes/195788
"Temporary derogation from certain provisions of the ePrivacy Directive to combat online child sexual abuse"
ist "ja" ein "JA" zur Kontrolle ?
@echo_pbreyer
Wieso geht das trotz "Nein"??? Kann mir das jemand erklären?
@cytro Es wäre eine absolute Mehrheit nötig gewesen, siehe Link im Post
@echo_pbreyer Immerhin bleibt es dabei, dass verschlüsselte Messages nicht gescannt werden. Unverschlüsselte sind ohnehin zu unsicher.
@echo_pbreyer Damit haben sich die Parlamentarier, die dafür gestimmt haben, zu Handlangern der US-BigTech Konzerne sowie der undemokratischen EU-Kommission und des Rates gemacht!
Mein Ansehen der Institutionen der Europäischen Union sinkt immer weiter.
@echo_pbreyer Gibt es eventuell eine Möglichkeit, das gerichtlich anzufechten? Das Gesetz war ja, wie ich hörte, als „neu“ eingebracht worden, obwohl es inhaltlich gleich zum abgelehnten alten war.
🇪🇺 The European Parliament lets #ChatControl 1.0 go through despite a majority voting against it (314:276) – allowing mass scanning of private chats until 2028. Survivors are warning. My analysis and why this is the wrong approach 👇
@echo_pbreyer What kind of fictional democracy is the European Parliament if the majority vote against it means nothing!? 😳😳
@echo_pbreyer Are the next steps through the courts?
If the Data Retention Directive (Directive 2006/24/EC) couldn't survive _Digital Rights Ireland and Others_ (C‑293/12 and C‑594/12), surely this is in many ways many times worse?
@clickhere A lawsuit is pending, but it takes ages
> “The fact that Chat Control is moving forward against the will of the majority of voting MEPs is a farce and damages democracy. Our children are the real losers in this undemocratic process. The passage of a genuine, permanent child protection regulation is now in serious jeopardy. The Council will never agree to a desperately needed paradigm shift as long as they can simply stick to the old approach of suspicionless scanning at the whim of the tech industry.”
So true. I am very pro-EU. Except these shenanigans make me get underbelly feelings of "FUCK EU, let it all go to shite then" (to say it diplomatically). Well.. take a deep breath. On to fighting off #ChatControl 2.0.
But also: Who are these freaking lobbyists that keep pushing this shebang against the wishes of the people, at all cost? More naming and shaming, please.
@smallcircles @echo_pbreyer Yea this sucks, the eu is often does wonderful things but it is also deeply flawed as seen here. The only fix for it is treaty reforms and unfortunately it is unlikely that member states will agree on such reforms any time soon...
@echo_pbreyer wait... Why TF vote at all? 🤦♂️
@echo_pbreyer Zie hierboven. Chat Control is (weer) terug.
@bert_hubert@mastodon.nl @bert_hubert@eupolicy.social @xot @Frederik_Borgesius
@echo_pbreyer How is this possible? -> "despite a majority voting against it (314:276)"
@echo_pbreyer Can anything be done about this? I heard rumors this move was illegal.
🇫🇷 Le Parlement européen laisse passer le #ChatControl 1.0 malgré une majorité de votes contre (314:276) – autorisant les scans de masse des conversations privées jusqu’en 2028. Des victimes mettent en garde. Mon analyse 👇
🇮🇹 Il Parlamento europeo lascia passare il #ChatControl 1.0 nonostante una maggioranza abbia votato contro (314:276) – consentendo la scansione di massa delle chat private fino al 2028. Le vittime mettono in guardia. 👇
🇪🇸 🇪🇺 El Parlamento Europeo deja pasar el #ChatControl 1.0 pese a que una mayoría votó en contra (314:276), permitiendo el escaneo masivo de chats privados hasta 2028. Las víctimas advierten de sus riesgos. Mi análisis 👇
