Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Charlotte Aten
Charlotte Aten
@caten@mathstodon.xyz  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@ferret Idk, the standard could intentionally configure your communications in a way that is more easily monitored via some other pathway the attacker controls. There's also the issue of people relying on reference implementations that may have some less subtle designed flaw.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Comrade Ferret
Comrade Ferret
@ferret@hub.workersofthe.world replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@ Charlotte Aten That's the value of open source. People have noticed security issues in the protocol, and they've been patched.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Charlotte Aten
Charlotte Aten
@caten@mathstodon.xyz replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago

@ferret I guess I just can't bring myself to trust my communications to a system that was made by people who were investigated for spying on the US for Israel. I hope that I'm just being paranoid, but it can't hurt to be careful these days.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Debacle
Debacle
@debacle@framapiaf.org replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@caten @ferret @anolandria

Just because we're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not after us 🙂

I'm personally not paranoid about Matrix, but still prefer #Jabber. Partially because the former is more or less dominated by a single vendor. Also, because #XMPP is more lightweight. Anyway, whatever is free and federated, is fine with me.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd:
Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd:
@gnemmi@mastodon.sdf.org replied  ·  activity timestamp yesterday

@ferret are we sure that it's an open standard?

I was under the impression that Matrix was an "open protocol" for decentralised, secure communications "that provided a set of open APIs" for decentralised communication.

Unlike #XMPP which is an actual open #IETF standard with multiple implementations in the form of clients, servers, server components, and code libraries.

@debacle @caten

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
The Matrix.org Foundation
The Matrix.org Foundation
@matrix@mastodon.matrix.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 22 hours ago

@gnemmi @ferret @debacle @caten yup, Matrix is an open standard, despite not being from IETF. Just as XSF is a SDO, so is The Matrix.org Foundation: you can read the open standards process at https://spec.matrix.org/proposals/ and see the wide range of MSCs from many different independent implementors and developers. Gentle reminder that the enemy is centralised surveillance capitalism, not other open source projects… :/

Matrix Specification

Spec Change Proposals

If you are interested in submitting a change to the Matrix Specification, please take note of the following guidelines. Most changes to the Specification require a formal proposal. Bug fixes, typos, and clarifications to existing behaviour do not need proposals - see the contributing guide for more information on what does and does not need a proposal. The proposal process involves some technical writing, having it reviewed by everyone, having the proposal being accepted, then actually having your ideas implemented as committed changes to the Specification repository.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd:
Gonzalo Nemmi :runbsd:
@gnemmi@mastodon.sdf.org replied  ·  activity timestamp 21 hours ago

@matrix let's get this clear and right out of the way: I personally never saw an enemy on you. My whole point was dead simple: IETF or not. And that was it. No ulterior motives nor hidden agenda on my part. And I absolutely agree with you in that the enemy is centralized surveillance capitalism, not other open source projects.

Feel free to carefully review all my toots and confirm that I never opposed Matrix being listed as an alternative.

@ferret @debacle @caten

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct