Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Jürgen Hubert
Jürgen Hubert
@juergen_hubert@mementomori.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

Again and again, I see the notion that humanity is committing "collective suicide" because we are not acting on #ClimateChange and other forms environmental destruction.

I do not accept this thesis. This is not suicide, it is murder - perpetrated by the oligarchs of this world and others who want the #FossilFuel economy going for their own profit.

And they have invested _massive_ amounts of money into propaganda to keep this system running. Not just by funding climate change denial - but also by promoting the concept of the individual "carbon footprint". Essentially, they have socialized the risks and privatized the profits, tricking us into believing that _we_ are to blame for not doing enough as individual persons, rather than _them_ for creating and perpetrating the system.

This is part of the "personal responsibility" ideology pushed by those who already own most of the world, but still want more. If _we_ as individuals share in the blame for _their_ decisions, even though _they_ gain all the benefits from them and we do not, then that means we would have to fight _ourselves_ to save the world - rather than the true villains of this story.

So let's put the accountability where it belongs, okay?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Alison Crosthwait
Alison Crosthwait
@alisoncrosthwait@theforkiverse.com replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@juergen_hubert ‘then that means we would have to fight ourselves’ (rather than them. This exactly- the level of success of their propaganda is astonishing… the number of everyday people who say “the rich work hard for what they have” is astonishing.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Scrungly
Scrungly
@LilDumplin@woof.tech replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@juergen_hubert preach!

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
The Sleight Doctor 🃏🍉
The Sleight Doctor 🃏🍉
@ApostateEnglishman@mastodon.world replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@juergen_hubert Yep. The whole concept of a "carbon footprint" came from a 2004 marketing campaign for BP, among the world's largest oil companies. The idea was to deflect responsibility for climate change by individualizing the problem, thereby delaying action against the major polluters. Since 1988, 100 companies have been the source of 70% of the world’s greenhouse emissions, and only 25 corporate or state-owned entities have been responsible for more than half of global industrial emissions.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
JakeKb
JakeKb
@JakeKb@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@juergen_hubert No, it's our fault too. We are way more than the oligarchs who ruin the planet and yet we don't organize and we don't try to make policies to stop them. Each and everyone of us has the personal responsibility to educate ourselves and our community and organize the fight from the bottom.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jürgen Hubert
Jürgen Hubert
@juergen_hubert@mementomori.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@JakeKb

Yes, most of us could do more to fight the oligarchs than we are currently doing.

But we would not _need_ to fight the oligarchs if they hadn't _chosen_ to ravage the planet for their own profit.

Anything else is victim-blaming.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
disorderlyf
disorderlyf
@disorderlyf@todon.eu replied  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@juergen_hubert Technically, the oil barons are committing suicide. They're just taking 90% of the species on earth with them, including the rest of humanity.

I agree it's a misguided notion to blame the whole species. I just also think the sentiment, while inaccurate, isn't necessarily coming from as defeatist a mindset as people think. It's like how people say humans are the "real monsters". Yeah, monsters can have redemption archs too if they want it and work at it.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Alan
Alan
@adkurtz@thecanadian.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Petra van Cronenburg
Petra van Cronenburg
@NatureMC@mastodon.online replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert What you write meets the latest Oxfam report: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/jan/10/world-richest-used-fair-share-emissions-2026-oxfam

But I have a different criticism of doom & gloom! The narrative of an apocalypse, of "humanity's suicide/extinction" dismisses all activism as ‘superfluous’ and ‘useless’. This aggressively resigned attitude merely avoids personal commitment and too often glosses over one's own inaction.

Only with hope we act. And yes, every action helps: That against the culprits *and* personal acting, living our visions.

the Guardian

World’s richest 1% have already used fair share of emissions for 2026, says Oxfam

Richest 1% took 10 days while wealthiest 0.1% needed just three days to exhaust annual carbon budget, study shows
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Prof Lutz
Prof Lutz
@pr_ret_lutz@jasette.facil.services replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert people killed by oligarchs using planned climate triggered multi-crisis?
➡️ #ClimatePurge

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Richard Michael Blaber
Richard Michael Blaber
@rmblaber1956@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert But we DO bear responsibility. Are we without agency? Who is it who allows the oligarchs to continue with their exploitation? Who allows them to maintain their wealth, their power & their privileges? If we don't rise up in revolt against them, we acquiesce in the system that creates the #climatechange, the environmental destruction, the loss of #biodiversity, & the social injustice.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jürgen Hubert
Jürgen Hubert
@juergen_hubert@mementomori.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@rmblaber1956

We _do_ share some responsibility, but it is in proportion to the power we have to affect things.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Richard Michael Blaber
Richard Michael Blaber
@rmblaber1956@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert Agreed - but they need to be deprived of that excessive power. If they aren't, & I fear they won't be, the result will a calamitous ecological catastrophe, where those least responsible for it will suffer the most. That is already the case, in fact.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Coralie Renée
Coralie Renée
@globcoco@mamot.fr replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert

Totally.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jeff C
Jeff C
@JeffC1956@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert
It bothers me a bit that people still focus blame on specific groups. The sociological issue of climate change is quite a bit more nuanced; if you're interested in spending a couple days reading about it I have a summary of a forthcoming book here, and you can volunteer to be a beta reader.

https://chappyessays.wordpress.com/2025/11/06/a-summary-of-my-climate-booklet/

Essays by J. Chapman

A Summary of My Climate Booklet

If you are interested in being a beta-reader for this book, see this page. Have you ever watched one of Major League Baseball’s condensed games? They only show the last pitch to each batter (and an…
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Sepia Fan
Sepia Fan
@stekopf@mstdn.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert

I know people who - when we talk about the climate issue and how one has any influence - tell me bluntly they'll only act when they are forced to. As long as their behaviour (obviously harmful to climate & nature) is allowed, they'll go on.

That's counter-"personal responsibility" and I accept that - under the condition they at least vote for needed change.

The issue is, they vote for parties that promise them to not change anything.

How do you call that? Delegated suicide?

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Marcus Reynolds
Marcus Reynolds
@MarcusMASTO@mas.to replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert

#StopUsingFossilFuel if you can. Use less if you can. I want my grandchildren to live in an environment that is not inhospitable and function in an economy that is not distorted by this commodity.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jürgen Hubert
Jürgen Hubert
@juergen_hubert@mementomori.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@MarcusMASTO

Oh, I do try to reduce it - I don't own a car, and my last private flight was in 2004.

But ultimately, to stop global warming we need to stop the people who profit from it the most.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Petra van Cronenburg
Petra van Cronenburg
@NatureMC@mastodon.online replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert We need BOTH.
@MarcusMASTO

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Peter Brown
Peter Brown
@peterbrown@mastodon.scot replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert you are absolutely right in that moving to a carbon free lifestyle (which I more or less have) does very little to shift the dial. It is still worth doing of course, but we should be putting a lot more pressure on the five or six largest polluters on the planet.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Grant
Grant
@gsymon@mstdn.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 4 days ago

@juergen_hubert

"those who already own most of the world"

Small correction:

"those who have already stolen most of the world"

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.35 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct