Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Strypey
Strypey
@strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@davekeating.substack.com
> Even when confronted with a US National Security Strategy planning their ouster, our centrist [EU] leaders have been silent in response

If Europeans want to know what the US has in store for supporters of the EU, look back at what they did to Libya in 2011 in response to their initiation of the African Union, and particularly their advocacy for a unified AU currency akin to the Euro;

https://theecologist.org/2016/mar/14/why-qaddafi-had-go-african-gold-oil-and-challenge-monetary-imperialism

#EU #AfricanUnion #Libya

@Gurre

The Ecologist

Why Qaddafi had to go: African gold, oil and the challenge to monetary imperialism

What was NATO's violent intervention in Libya really all about? Now we know, writes Ellen Brown, thanks to Hillary Clinton's recently published emails. It was to prevent the creation of an independent hard currency in Africa that would free the continent from economic bondage under the dollar, the IMF and the French African franc, shaking off the last heavy chains of colonial exploitation.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-alpha.40 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct