Post
Yes, not everyone wants to live in an apartment, but that doesn't imply that most people don't want to live an an apartment, when it means being able to live affordably in close proximity to jobs, shopping, schools, cultural events, public transportation, and infrastructure.
Cities everywhere have testified to this truth for over 7000 years of the history of human civilization. That's why cities are cities, why they have high populations.
No one is trying to force you to live in a city.
Where land is dear (that means expensive and in short supply), tiny houses should not be permitted, except possibly as temporary or accessory dwelling units.
Many cities are waking up to this problem, and getting rid of single family occupancy zoning.
The answer to the housing crisis is always and only "build more apartments". Only by flooding the market with supply can we control the cost of living.
The only way we can sustainably achieve this is by making it more expensive to not build.
Yes, not everyone wants to live in an apartment, but that doesn't imply that most people don't want to live an an apartment, when it means being able to live affordably in close proximity to jobs, shopping, schools, cultural events, public transportation, and infrastructure.
Cities everywhere have testified to this truth for over 7000 years of the history of human civilization. That's why cities are cities, why they have high populations.
No one is trying to force you to live in a city.
#Cities are cities precisely because鈥攄emonstrably鈥攎ore people want to live in urban environments than those who abhor the idea altogether, for all the advantages that cities have to offer.
Only in America and other places where land and fossil fuels have been historically cheap and abundant, have people developed the idea of #suburbia and glorify and idealize #ruralism supported by private motor vehicles.
#urbanism #architecture #planning #design #housing #policy #economics #politics
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate
