Interessat papier d'Evgeny Morozov qui pose très clairement le rapport actuel de celleux qui se revendiquent du socialisme (les vrais, pas le PS, pas LFI) qui tentent d'appliquer un paradigme qui semble éculé sur les plateformes et en règle générale par rapport à l'IA générative.
Il introduit le sujet ainsi et pose la question à revoir nos schémas de pensée qui s'appliquent mal aux nouvelles technologies (et indirectement à l'incroyabe puissance financière qui les soutiennent, jamais égalés dans notre histoire, point que la technocritique évite généralement d'aborder)
"Artificial intelligence has produced a rare kind of popular curiosity. Not only among investors and founders, but among people who open a browser,
type a question, and feel—however inaccurately—that something on the other side is thinking with them. That phenomenology matters. Whatever we think about hype, hallucinations, or OpenAI’s capitalization table, AI arrives as a technology whose uses are discovered after deployment, whose boundaries are porous, and whose side‑effects appear in places nobody designed for. “Generative” is not just a marketing word; it names a genuine instability.
For socialists, this instability poses a specific challenge. And their reflexes are familiar: Regulate platforms, tax windfalls, nationalize leading firms, plug their models into a planning apparatus. But if socialism is to be more than capitalism with nicer dashboards—if it really is a project of collectively remaking material life, not just of redistributing its outputs—it has to answer a harder question: Can it offer a better way of living with this technology than capitalism does? Can it deliver a distinct form of life worth wanting rather than just a fairer share of what capital has already made? "
