@reiver ⊼ (Charles) :batman:
and 1 other
boosted
Hey @yunohost j'ai contacté les devs de #hollo #hollosocial et #snac2 (respectivement @hongminhee et @grunfink ) et le dev de snac2 à dit qu'il serait plus que content d'aider à la mise en place de l'app dans yunohost, et pour hollo le dev m'a donné le lien d'une issue GitHub
Je serais moi aussi plus que content de voir ces apps dans le catalogue et apparemment je ne serai pas le seul.
Prospérité sur vous parce que vous faites un boulot exceptionnel ❤️
Edit: est-ce qu'un traducteur serait disponible pour traduire en français les settings de Gotosocial sur l'interface web svp ? :)
LiquidParasyte
and 4 others
boosted
A couple days ago, I got a DM from a #Bonfire user. I happily replied and sent
a follow request—but the Accept never came back, even though they hadn't
enabled manuallyApprovesFollowers. My DM reply probably never arrived either. Classic interop bug.
I checked out the Bonfire source and dug in. Turns out Bonfire hasn't implemented RFC 9421 yet, so it was silently discarding any activity signed with it. That alone would be workable, except for one more issue: Bonfire was responding 200 OK even when signature verification failed, instead of 401 Unauthorized.
This matters because Fedify implements a double-knocking mechanism—if a request signed with RFC 9421 fails, it retries with the older draft cavage signature. But since Bonfire returned 200 OK on the failed first knock, #Fedify had no reason to send a second one.
I filed two issues on the Bonfire #ActivityPub repo—one requesting RFC 9421 support, and one about returning 401 on invalid signatures. For the latter, I also sent a PR, which got merged pretty quickly: bonfire-networks/activity_pub#9.
That said, individual Bonfire instances won't pick up the fix until they actually deploy it. So in the meantime, I patched Hollo and Hackers' Pub to use draft-cavage-http-signatures-12 as the firstKnock, so Bonfire instances can at least understand the first request.
One last thing: Fedify caches whether a given server supports RFC 9421, and the Bonfire servers I'd already talked to were cached as “supports RFC 9421”—because they'd been returning 200 OK. I had to manually clear that cache on both hollo.social and hackers.pub before everything finally worked.
After all that, the mutual follow went through and my DM reply landed. Worth it.
Fediverse Development
boosted
Introducing #Hollo. Hollo is an #ActivityPub-enabled single-user microblogging software. Although it's for a single user, it also supports creating and running multiple accounts for different topics.
It's headless, meaning you can use existing #Mastodon client apps instead, with its Mastodon-compatible APIs. It has most feature parity with Mastodon. Two big differences with Mastodon is that you can use #Markdown in the content of your posts and you can quote another post.
Oh, and Hollo is built using #Bun and #Fedify.
A couple days ago, I got a DM from a #Bonfire user. I happily replied and sent
a follow request—but the Accept never came back, even though they hadn't
enabled manuallyApprovesFollowers. My DM reply probably never arrived either. Classic interop bug.
I checked out the Bonfire source and dug in. Turns out Bonfire hasn't implemented RFC 9421 yet, so it was silently discarding any activity signed with it. That alone would be workable, except for one more issue: Bonfire was responding 200 OK even when signature verification failed, instead of 401 Unauthorized.
This matters because Fedify implements a double-knocking mechanism—if a request signed with RFC 9421 fails, it retries with the older draft cavage signature. But since Bonfire returned 200 OK on the failed first knock, #Fedify had no reason to send a second one.
I filed two issues on the Bonfire #ActivityPub repo—one requesting RFC 9421 support, and one about returning 401 on invalid signatures. For the latter, I also sent a PR, which got merged pretty quickly: bonfire-networks/activity_pub#9.
That said, individual Bonfire instances won't pick up the fix until they actually deploy it. So in the meantime, I patched Hollo and Hackers' Pub to use draft-cavage-http-signatures-12 as the firstKnock, so Bonfire instances can at least understand the first request.
One last thing: Fedify caches whether a given server supports RFC 9421, and the Bonfire servers I'd already talked to were cached as “supports RFC 9421”—because they'd been returning 200 OK. I had to manually clear that cache on both hollo.social and hackers.pub before everything finally worked.
After all that, the mutual follow went through and my DM reply landed. Worth it.
Tim Chambers
and 8 others
boosted
Hi #fediverse and #ActivityPub developers!
I'm currently working on interoperability testing for #Hollo and #Fedify, and I need a #Bonfire account to test federation with their implementation.
Since there aren't many open public Bonfire instances available, I was wondering if any Bonfire instance admins out there would be willing to grant me a test account? It would be a huge help for improving interop! Let me know if you can help. Thanks!