@ben wrote a good article "Growing the open social web" for FediForum.

It poses this *essential* question: Why do we want to grow the open social web and for whom?

While the question is crucial when considering the future of social networking and the role of online technologies in society, it is not a question that is being addressed in any significant way. Our social web and fediverse "just happens", emerging from this chaotic cauldron of mostly technical discussions about which features to put in apps, how to connect one app to the next, and which social web technology or app is better than others.

Ben makes an appeal for creating good protocols, where the real value is, but only if we can share ownership of them. I 100% agree with the points in the article.

But how do we get there? What is this ownership? How do we achieve it, and subsequently retain it? I wrote down some some thoughts in a blog post.

https://coding.social/blog/shared-ownership/

#SX #SocialCoding #SocialWeb #fediverse #ActivityPub

@liaizon@social.wake.st

I've been saying this

the SWF is just kinda there but to my knowledge doesn't really do much outside of like wordpress and mastodon. and working with meta i guess.

I for one have never heard of anyone from the SWF or Mastodon reaching out to other implementations to coordinate on, say, quotes with authorization.

meanwhile on the ATProto end, there is groups like https://standard.site just to standardize long-form content.

Fediverse Development and 1 other boosted