@alice its great that you expressed your boundaries like this. You did it very respectfully towards your followers.

In a more general sense I wonder how the social network might further support you so that you do not have to repeat sending these toots.

(I just launched a new site for https://coding.social that positions Social experience design #SX which starts solution design from personal perspective and focus on Personal social networking to collect SX patterns on https://discuss.coding.social)

"App stores are designed for companies distributing software to consumers, not amateurs sharing tools with their friends. This is a system of industrial mass production, not small-scale craft."

https://www.inkandswitch.com/essay/malleable-software/

The F-Droid project aspires to be about amateurs sharing tools with friends, more an app library than an app store. I wonder how it could be extended to make the apps it ships more malleable by the people using them?

(2/2)

@strypey

Yes, seen this. I follow Ink & Switch closely, as all their publications are mighty interesting.

For people interested in the general subject there's a great collective facilitated by @jryans at:

https://malleable.systems

The article is discussed on their forum:

https://forum.malleable.systems/t/ink-switch-malleable-software-essay/340

Btw, the concept of 'malleable systems' is taken a step further under Social experience design, with 'moldable operational systems', 'moldable services' and 'evolvable solutions'.

#SX#SocialCoding

SX Circles of Sustainability.

An adaptation of the model that is more suitable for technology innovation and introduction of new technologies into society. The model removes the #Politics circle and adds an all-pervasive #Technology circle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circles_of_Sustainability

#SX#Sustainability#HarmoniousTechnology#HumaneTechnology

Politics and power dynamics are intricate emergent forces that depend on social context and permeate our social fabric.

“How can you just eliminate the Politics circle?”, one may ask. In FOSS circles there are many who feel that “All tech is political”, or even that everything is political. Politics, or rather power dynamics, are an emergent force. A very nuanced and intricate force that permeates the social fabric of society and has different names that depend on social context, participants and the kind of human activities they are involved in. “Politics” itself can be said to constitute a social construct when adopting the societal perspective of SX, albeit not a very useful one.

By eliminating the circle SX encourages a focus shift that avoids the inevitable negative impact on any discussion once the word “politics” is dropped, and everyone has their own perception of what that entails. The term is too vague, too overloaded, and even weaponised. It’s use has the effect that heels go in the sand, ideologies are brushed up, and arguments prepared for the fight with ‘political opponents’ - instead of coworkers - in fierce, often heated debate. For furtile cocreation a safe and inclusive environment is a requirement. Places where people are stimulated to be creative and open-minded in the discussion of fresh ideas. There is a time and place for constructive political discussion and debate, but politics should not be the default modus operandus that sets tone and culture.
Politics and power dynamics are intricate emergent forces that depend on social context and permeate our social fabric. “How can you just eliminate the Politics circle?”, one may ask. In FOSS circles there are many who feel that “All tech is political”, or even that everything is political. Politics, or rather power dynamics, are an emergent force. A very nuanced and intricate force that permeates the social fabric of society and has different names that depend on social context, participants and the kind of human activities they are involved in. “Politics” itself can be said to constitute a social construct when adopting the societal perspective of SX, albeit not a very useful one. By eliminating the circle SX encourages a focus shift that avoids the inevitable negative impact on any discussion once the word “politics” is dropped, and everyone has their own perception of what that entails. The term is too vague, too overloaded, and even weaponised. It’s use has the effect that heels go in the sand, ideologies are brushed up, and arguments prepared for the fight with ‘political opponents’ - instead of coworkers - in fierce, often heated debate. For furtile cocreation a safe and inclusive environment is a requirement. Places where people are stimulated to be creative and open-minded in the discussion of fresh ideas. There is a time and place for constructive political discussion and debate, but politics should not be the default modus operandus that sets tone and culture.
Diagram showing the revised version of the Circles of Sustainability model as SX defines it. Three circles overlap each other in a Venn diagram with the sweet spot in the center. These represent Culture, Ecology and Economics. Surrounding all three circles is the fourth circle of Technology.
Diagram showing the revised version of the Circles of Sustainability model as SX defines it. Three circles overlap each other in a Venn diagram with the sweet spot in the center. These represent Culture, Ecology and Economics. Surrounding all three circles is the fourth circle of Technology.

Welcome social coder. Let's focus on social experience design in order to cocreate socio-cultural solutions that scale from individual needs to our inter-personal relationships in order to leave 'societal imprint'.

#SX is a natural extension to #DX and #UX that goes beyond technical systems and socio-technical platforms. SX unites sociosphere and technosphere to add missing social layers of the open social stack to our fediverse.

We are a commons. We are people. We are in control. We evolve. ✊

@BillySmith yes, there are a plethora of methods. The reality is that each FOSS project has its own relevant aspects of the FSDL. It can only be an informative pattern library and not a fixed prescribed process.

For #SX I am specifically looking at methodology that is tailored to work against the social dynamics that exist in larger grassroots enviroments, such as a technology ecosystem. Here the FSDL of individual participants deliver services which in turn form the solutions for stated needs.

@BillySmith totally.

You should see these stages and the arrows as indicative. This was inspired by RUP, the Rational unified process which had a brief spark of popularity years ago. There you have stages and parallel tracks for various disciplines which all cover the entire lifecycle, but are most prominent only in particular stages. You can see that depicted in the diagram at:

https://discuss.coding.social/t/brainstorm-components-of-the-free-software-development-lifecycle-wiki-post/53/2

@BillySmith

Interestingly the Dispersal stage provides a different perspective of what happens with a FOSS project at the end of its lifecycle.

So a project isn't "dead" and work / energy wasted. It's value lives on in the commons, it disperses. In countless ways the value is persistent.

I just made a reference to dispersed value, and it inspired me also to model an important concept for Social experience design #SX and Sustainable open social systems #SOSS as initiatives where #FOSS evolves.

#TIL about a hardware company called #reMarkable;

"Our scientific advisors help us understand how technology affects attention — and guide us in creating products that protect focus and support more deliberate ways of working. This work is designed to spur innovation, test ideas through rigorous research, and champion focused thinking."

https://remarkable.com/scientific-advisory-board

Not sure if their software is Free Code. But You might find this relevant to your work on SX design @smallcircles.

#hardware

@strypey thank you! Wonderful product. And their approach to calm tech and thoughtful design really shines through.

I really like how they phrased what their product 'feels like' poetically (which unfortunately is an image without alt-text, or I would've share below). That comes close to Social experience design #SX in how it starts with envisioning the solution and elaborating individual needs.

https://remarkable.com/using-remarkable/inspiration/why-deep-thought-matters-defending-focus-in-a-distracted-world

@nicol @steltenpower @julian @encyclia

The other day @steve @trwnh and I had a very interesting brainstorm discussion - a #SX solution mockup - about a #Protosocial ActivityPub protocol extension, that is both service-oriented and supportive of a full linked data profile.

For anyone interested, the top of this "Groundwork labs" matrix chatroom discussion can be found at:

https://discuss.coding.social/t/protosocial-activitypub-protocol/665

The #fediverse-we-have is predominantly #AppCentric, and that rigid perspective is limiting the promise and potential of the #ActivityPub#SocialWeb protocol.

What would it mean to offer #services on the fediverse, that people can discover, obtain and compose into solutions that satisfy their #social networking needs?

By focusing more on the #ServiceOriented message exchange #architecture, the future fediverse can be one of versatile and interoperable Apps & Services.

#SX

@mousey

Exactly. Underlying the thought provoker are some ideas around Social experience design methodology to tackle Tragedy of the Commons and lesser-known Tyranny of Small Decisions.

By focusing on the true value of the commons, and where this value derives from.

#SX involves a mindset shift to look differently at what a commons is, and how it can sustainably evolve.

@Remittancegirl this is spot on! Thank you. It inspired me to toot about Social experience design #SX

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/114869057941271973

What I found to be a remarkable example was a documentary by Louis Theroux where he interviews a Ku Klux Klan leader, who is best buddies with his African-American neighbor, drinking beers on the porch together.

When Louis asked "Shouldn't you two not be sworn enemies, given your ideology?". They looked a bit surprised at each other and replied "We? We are neighbors".

@Remittancegirl

Btw, my other toot followed after @andre referenced yours with the observation "[See this toot] on how can be a force for peace".

While not naming "peace" specifically SX encourages a perspective shift and focus on the intrinsic values of Freedom and Humanity which will lead to more awareness of all these simple and small social gestures and how they may be translated to humane technology and online communication systems that truly support rich and social human interaction.

@Remittancegirl this is spot on! Thank you. It inspired me to toot about Social experience design #SX

https://social.coop/@smallcircles/114869057941271973

What I found to be a remarkable example was a documentary by Louis Theroux where he interviews a Ku Klux Klan leader, who is best buddies with his African-American neighbor, drinking beers on the porch together.

When Louis asked "Shouldn't you two not be sworn enemies, given your ideology?". They looked a bit surprised at each other and replied "We? We are neighbors".

"Small is Huge". Smallness in all the things. At local and interpersonal scales the social habits and dynamics are in a much better state than in the places where we enter online global public squares. Personal social networking, is a part of SX to explore, and the second perspective of SX (in a pyramid model of 3 perspective) focuses on interpersonal relationships.

The first perspective is personal and focuses on individual needs. While the third perspective is where it all combines into intricate societal constructs, and our solutions can be designed to have "societal impact". Society is the tapestry where we weave our social experiences together.

Social experience design is based on the intrinsic values of #Freedom and #Humanity in all its rich facets.

#SX

#SocialCoding commons is a movement of people interested in exploring the more #social sides of decentralized #SocialNetworking environments and focuses on building solutions that serve people’s needs: social experiences. For this we explore a methodology called Social experience design ( #SX ) tailored to cocreating Sustainable open social systems ( #SOSS ) in order to deliver services for the #SocialWeb. A fediverse that goes “beyond the app” towards a #peopleverse that serves our daily lives.