We’re collaborating across several key areas:
🔎 Enhancing discoverability for Channels on Bonfire
🧭 Improving interoperability between the Channels app and Bonfire
🌌 Partnering to offer services for organisations around Bonfire’s Mosaic initiative
Public Interest Social Networks
Bonfire is built by communities, for communities. Rooted in autonomy, mutual care, and collective power. Co-create your tools, reclaim your data, and resist manipulation by shaping your own federated digital spaces.
Previously at @bonfire@indieweb.social
We’re collaborating across several key areas:
🔎 Enhancing discoverability for Channels on Bonfire
🧭 Improving interoperability between the Channels app and Bonfire
🌌 Partnering to offer services for organisations around Bonfire’s Mosaic initiative
Bonfire is one of the most exciting projects in the ActivityPub ecosystem, whilst Newsmast brings experience in community-building, advocacy, and outreach through projects like channel.org.
You can learn more about Bonfire's Mosaic project here: bonfirenetworks.org/mosaic/
Newsmast x Bonfire
We’re excited to share that Newsmast and @bonfire are working together!
We’re collaborating across several key areas:
🔎 Enhancing discoverability for Channels on Bonfire
🧭 Improving interoperability between the Channels app and Bonfire
🌌 Partnering to offer services for organisations around Bonfire’s Mosaic initiative
Newsmast is one of the most promising organisations pushing the fediverse forward with community-building, advocacy, and outreach.
And Channel.org is bringing innovations in collective publishing and content curation.
Together, we're creating pathways to support organizations discover the power of federated, community-owned social infrastructure.
Learn more about Mosaic: https://bonfirenetworks.org/mosaic
@newsmast
Bonfire x Newsmast
We’re excited to share that Bonfire and @newsmast are working together.
We’re collaborating across several key areas:
🔎 Enhancing discoverability for Channels on Bonfire
🧭 Improving interoperability between the Channels mobile app and Bonfire
🌌 Partnering to offer services for organisations around Bonfire’s Mosaic initiative
Bonfire is one of the most exciting projects in the ActivityPub ecosystem, whilst Newsmast brings experience in community-building, advocacy, and outreach through projects like https://Channel.org.
You can learn more about Bonfire's Mosaic project here: https://bonfirenetworks.org/mosaic/
Let’s see what we can achieve together!
Two new profile widgets coming in the next #OpenScience flavour release:
📄 Most Recent Publication: showcase your latest work
⭐ Most Cited Publication: highlight your most cited publication
🔧 Quantitative metrics now hidden by default while we consider removing them entirely ( discussion here: https://indieweb.social/@bonfire/114929867344891955 )
✨ New settings panel lets users toggle each widget on/off individually
@nicebread This is a crucial question to discuss in the open and possibly create a statement from it somewhere for future reference...
Should the open science network commit to the #DORA and #CoARA agreements and therefore not include researchers quantitative metrics at all ?
Pinging among others: @jorgeluis @fresseng @brembs @JACoates @kfitz @pierre @markwilliams @openscience@a.gup.pe
@nicebread This is exactly the kind of feedback we're looking for! we were thinking of hiding the quantitative metrics widget by default and letting users show it on demand if they want it... to be more aligned with https://coara.eu/agreement/the-commitments/ (which also @fresseng pointed us to few days ago)
Would this approach make sense to you?
@openscience@a.gup.pe
For those curious about what's technically possible, here's the OpenAlex API docs: https://docs.openalex.org/
We could explore research networks, collaboration patterns, open access rates, interdisciplinary connections, and more...
The question is:
what would make profiles genuinely useful for how you work?
Let's build this together 🔬
@open_science
As we integrate #OpenAlex data into the #Bonfire#OpenScience flavor, we're displaying familiar metrics: works count, citations, h-index, research topics, institutional affiliations...
These might be exactly what you need, or perhaps just a starting point.
What additional information would help you find collaborators or understand someone's work better?
We're opening this design process to the open science community. Share what works, what doesn't, what's missing.
@open_science
1/2
we're indeed very curious about the TwoWay RSS @fahrni was talking about... 👀