Training AI models on copyrighted works is "squarely what transformative use is," EFF’s Tori Noble told Reason - these are "general purpose tools" and "exactly the kind of creation that copyright is designed to foster.” https://reason.com/2026/09/04/doj-says-barring-ai-training-on-copyrighted-material-could-severely-hamper-tech-progress/
@eff Burn in hell, you fascist backstabbers.
@eff regurgitating content in a statistically probable manner is not transformation. Transformation requires intent.
Robut has no intent.
There is case law on this already.
Please unfuck yourselves.
@eff fuck 'tech progress', it's.progressed enough.
@eff This is exactly the kind of creation copyright exits to protect from. Fuck off.
@eff I disagree. To my mind, 'transformative' requires human intent.
@eff boooooooooooooo
@eff no human = no intent = no transformation
eff y'all done fucked up
@eff "Billionaires stealing creative work is fine" is a stance you can take, I guess.
It's a bad stance, but you can take it.
@eff yeah, that's an unfollow for me. Eat farts and beat street.
@eff Unfollowing, removing from annual donation list
@eff What about “Purpose and character of the use, including whether the use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes”?
@eff I didn't have "EFF being deeply corrupt in the stupidest way imaginable" on my bingo card
I hope that boot tastes good
@eff Hello! Fuck you.
@eff So... fuck the planet right? I mean, you're putting your support behind what's already causing massive amounts of pollution and political corruption (municipal up to executive) across the country.
I donated to you guys a long time ago. I wish I could get a refund all these years later.