I know that the software systems that underpin the web are complex and configurable in millions of ways.
I know that simplifying the point of entry comes with a price. And usually that price is some sort of enclosure. Someone has done the work to create the simplified paths and make them robust and, understandably, wants to make money from their ‘platform’.
I know this.
Nonetheless, there is an enormous chasm between the people for whom installing and configuring is “easy”, and everybody else
…What saddens me is that when it comes to social software the bifurcation is especially acute.
On the one hand, there are people doing amazing pro-social systems work, but the point of entry they create is most often a high cognitive wall if you don’t already swim in the command line.
And on the other are platforms where the cost of entry is exceedingly low, but those platforms lean into extraction and manipulation.
I wish we could break this down a bit