Discussion
What should digital infrastructure for open science look like, and more importantly, who should shape it?
Universities and scholarly communities are starting to explore new directions together. This includes a living lab at Warwick, governance research with Princeton HCI and experiments with the Prosocial Design Network.
We invite more scientists, research communities and universities to join: experiment and study it, co-design what comes next, and help govern the Open Science Network.
@Bonfire I am sorry to keep asking, but I am wondering where you settled on an AI policy for contributors.
Based on this it looks like you've gone all in: https://github.com/bonfire-networks/bonfire-app/blob/main/AGENTS.md
Am I misunderstanding?
@reflex@retrogaming.social I'm sorry but we have already replied to you several times and would appreciate your patience in the meantime, for reference: github.com/bonfire-networks/...
@Bonfire Subscribed to that issue. I am sorry if I seem impatient, it's just difficult to be in a holding pattern for many months now. I think the question that matters to me is not what the AI policy is, but whether or not it's permitted at all. I am not looking for a nuanced take, just whether or not it will be permitted in any capacity.
I'll try to hold out, hopefully you make a public statement when you get there.
Shared your post with the 6529.io community — the question of who governs our digital infrastructure is exactly the kind of permissionless, decentralized thinking we care about. Thanks for the great work!
Install bonfire.cafe
Get the full app experience
