First time seeing a “NO META GLASSES” sign in the door of a shop! I’m not surprised… and I expect we might see more of these kind of things in the years ahead.
Post
Replies:
59
@danyork it's a touchy one as I use mine for hearing assistance from time to time (conversation focus) due to me having impaired hearing, plus they're prescription - technically a disability aid.
@danyork when these glasses are combined with prescription lenses, it will create some weird situations...
@glaurent And from what I have read on several sites, various companies ARE making these available for prescription lenses!
@danyork as they should since there's obviously a pretty large market for those... so whoever creates AR glasses that are privacy oriented is going to win big.
@glaurent Yes, I think it will be interesting to see if someone does create privacy-oriented AR glasses.
For instance, Bloomberg reported recently that Apple is experimenting with different designs for smartglasses - https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/12/apple-reportedly-testing-four-designs-for-upcoming-smart-glasses/
Apple has certainly been talking about privacy in many ways. What will their smartglasses be like? (They also have AI models running locally on an iPhone that could perhaps keep a lot of processing local.)
It's a strange new world!
@danyork do they have security cameras inside?
@dd0ul I don’t know, because I didn’t go in the store (I was just walking by).
I think the difference, though, is that if there are security cameras (and again I don’t know) in-store video surveillance is probably not* sent off to a ginormous company like Meta. That seems to be the concern I see coming through in comments.
——
* I don’t know the state of in-store security cameras. The streams COULD be being sent off to equally questionable companies!
Seeing various comments, I will add a couple of points:
- I don’t own any Meta glasses.
- I didn’t go into the store as it had no interest for me. I was just walking by and noticed the sign.
- While the sign focuses on Meta, a quick search shows that many other companies either have or are developing “smart glasses”, including Google, Amazon, Apple, Snap
- There ARE very real accessibility use cases:
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/apr/07/the-life-changing-magic-of-wearing-smartglasses
With privacy concerns… a *lot* for us as a society to sort out!
My own concerns are really around:
- how much recognition / activity is being processed locally (glasses and local smartphone) vs sent off to some system for processing?
- who has access to the data being streamed from the smartglasses?
- what is being done with it?
- is it being fed into a massive facial recognition database?
- is it being used to train AI LLMs?
- how many additional companies have access to the images and videos? (Ex. moderators)
Many more questions like that…
So totally on point Dan.
These glasses are the data funnel for a whole new universe of data abuse (intellectual property theft, privacy violations, tracking and surveillance without warrant or due process)
Once in the hands of authoritarian states or companies alike this data is easy to leverage for good or bad (for example dropping bombs or stopping a virus outbreak)
@danyork Ich frage mich gerade ob es in der Location wohl Videoüberwachung gibt?🤔
@Ihazchaos Eine gute Frage. Ich bin eigentlich gar nicht in den Laden gegangen. Ich bin nur vorbeigegangen.
Aber falls sie doch eine Videoüberwachung hätten ... ich glaube, der Unterschied besteht darin, dass ihr Video wahrscheinlich nicht an ein Unternehmen wie Meta gestreamt wird.
(Noch einmal: Ich habe keine Ahnung, ob sie Videoüberwachung haben.)
@danyork these glasses should simply be made illegal at least in Europe
@danyork Predicted this a number of years ago; "No Smart Glasses" signs, will outsell smart glasses.
@danyork
Wait until they see my new athletic supporter with hidden built-in camera and microphone. The wearer can even choose whether the camera is outward pointing or inward.
My wife uses Meta glasses because she's blind.
While I'm all for blocking those who film others without consent, this does prevent her from using assistive technology that is helpful for the vision impaired.
@davidtheeviloverlord Yes, I can definitely see the benefits from an accessibility point of view. This is one of the things that we as a society will need to grapple with - balancing the benefits of inclusion with the concerns around privacy.
The difference btw your wife who needs the assistance - and some influencer who is streaming to their pages…
… and who or what has access to all the data that is coming from those glasses.
(It would be easier if all processing was local.)
@danyork im blocking a lot of people ITT who dont understand consent 😂
"but my <excuse>"
no, because you want to violate another person's privacy without consent, including long-term knock-on effects of giving inagery of them to fascists.
find another way
Definitely love the push back, I'm just wondering about actual enforcement of such a thing.
@danyork Just wait until Apple combines VisionOS “lite” with those Ray-Ban glasses. It’s going to get much worse for privacy.
@danyork I love it. Metaglass wearers are just the new glassholes. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Glasshole
@danyork this spying on each other shit is ridiculous
@danyork Basically all places I know don't allow indoor recordings without prior obtained permission and that provision doesn't care about whether it's a TV crew with a big-ass camera, smartphone, or whatever (hidden) cameras…
- Most premises will literally kick people out and ban them if caught.
@danyork I am nauseous but this is wonderful.
I lost a job once because other people taking pictures of me on the job without my permission. Company said no pictures. People kept taking pictures of me. :(
@danyork excellent idea
If anyone cone near me with em on I'll rip them off
I don't want to be recorded without my knowledge
@danyork I am 100% behind this
@danyork back in the day of the Google Glass we called them #Glassholes
@danyork time to bring back "don't be a #glasshole " from the old Google glass days.
@danyork hmmm, guessing that’s in connection to AI too.
@danyork there is an ISO standard for warning signs. One of them is this:
@danyork people buying these are ot considering such circumstances where their (precious) consumer choices aren't sacrosanct to all others
And now they're getting these things with prescription lenses, so removing them becomes onerous and "unreasonable"
@danyork FAcebook was founded on the idea of being creepy as fuck and stalking folk.
Creepy as fuck.
Mark is a voyeur, always has been.
So this is just more of the same.
@danyork I'd feel more comfortable seeing a fellow customer in a restaurant with holstered pistol than I would than one wearing those panopticon goggles. safer
@danyork We obviously don't frequent the same strip clubs
@danyork if you've been acting long enough, you do remember the "Glassholes" when Google glass was originally unveiled back in 2013
@danyork a small mole “no assholes” sign does the same thing
@danyork I run an app on my phone that sounds an alarm whenever meta glasses come near me.
@hans_zelf @danyork is there a similar app that finds and alerts of audio recorders nearby uploading the audio to some AI service?
@hans_zelf @Ecazar Interesting… I wonder if someone will start offering a scanning device that shops (and other locations) could start using. 🤔
I feel pity for the lost souls that have to take off their prescription meta ray bans at this shop, and are forced to blindstumble through the aisles trying to fingerguess what they're holding. "Errr... Excuse me, how much is this banana?" "Sir, this a sex shop not a grocery store."
@danyork i hope they make an exception for blind people that use these as ectr help with the be my eyes app
