Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
spdrnl
spdrnl
@spdrnl@sigmoid.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@UlrikeHahn Here is a follow up.

Sketching some solutions, far from perfect. From my experience in design, the more constraints there are, the smaller the solution space becomes.

And that is a good thing. A large solution space suggests many solutions. In a small solution space a design becomes more obvious.

There are two connected solution parts that are interesting:
1. Organizing feedback loops in science, including review
2. Creating trust networks both for scientists and articles.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
spdrnl
spdrnl
@spdrnl@sigmoid.social  ·  activity timestamp last week

@UlrikeHahn

These are all separate concerns. Your (communal) space, is your(communal) space.

Somebody else wants a space that is structured differently?

Fine, if sensible, configure it yourself.

The muddled connectedness is currently the issue I think.

4/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
spdrnl
spdrnl
@spdrnl@sigmoid.social  ·  activity timestamp last week

@UlrikeHahn I can imagine that the large steps, also language wise feel uncomfortable, perhaps disrespectful. The latter is not intended, the playing rules for science and design are different.

The process I am trying to maintain is big steps, outline requirements, outline strategies, rinse and repeat. (I see some possibilities.)

5/ and end.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
spdrnl
spdrnl
@spdrnl@sigmoid.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@UlrikeHahn Here is a follow up.

Sketching some solutions, far from perfect. From my experience in design, the more constraints there are, the smaller the solution space becomes.

And that is a good thing. A large solution space suggests many solutions. In a small solution space a design becomes more obvious.

There are two connected solution parts that are interesting:
1. Organizing feedback loops in science, including review
2. Creating trust networks both for scientists and articles.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
spdrnl
spdrnl
@spdrnl@sigmoid.social  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago

@UlrikeHahn Not sure if this part made it to the posts.

If you do not own the infrastructure you are just a passenger on a train. This goes for scientists too. It start with closing the loop on your own infrastructure, power emanates from there.

It's the same for cloud and AI at large for for example Europe. This is why I am pushing this hash-tag in the data domain.

#itistheinfrastructurestupid

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Ulrike Hahn
Ulrike Hahn
@UlrikeHahn@fediscience.org  ·  activity timestamp 7 hours ago

@spdrnl what I still don’t see is how resources, even with rearranging, will keep up with ever greater production…

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
spdrnl
spdrnl
@spdrnl@sigmoid.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 hours ago

@UlrikeHahn Thank you for your question, I indeed did not make this explicit.

The answer is separating storage and indexing.

The author is responsible for obtaining a DOI reference and storing in an online decentralized repository.

Now to indexing.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.29 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct