Hopeful progress I see in social media.
Having infrastructure that can be arranged by scientists, very much like the fediverse, is I think the right direction. This on top of the infrastructure.
In a similar fashion, governments (on a national level), companies (for applications) and professional associations (where they would like to contribute) can arrange their own view and workspace. On top of infrastructure.
3/
These are all separate concerns. Your (communal) space, is your(communal) space.
Somebody else wants a space that is structured differently?
Fine, if sensible, configure it yourself.
The muddled connectedness is currently the issue I think.
4/
@UlrikeHahn I can imagine that the large steps, also language wise feel uncomfortable, perhaps disrespectful. The latter is not intended, the playing rules for science and design are different.
The process I am trying to maintain is big steps, outline requirements, outline strategies, rinse and repeat. (I see some possibilities.)
5/ and end.
@UlrikeHahn Here is a follow up.
Sketching some solutions, far from perfect. From my experience in design, the more constraints there are, the smaller the solution space becomes.
And that is a good thing. A large solution space suggests many solutions. In a small solution space a design becomes more obvious.
There are two connected solution parts that are interesting:
1. Organizing feedback loops in science, including review
2. Creating trust networks both for scientists and articles.
@UlrikeHahn Not sure if this part made it to the posts.
If you do not own the infrastructure you are just a passenger on a train. This goes for scientists too. It start with closing the loop on your own infrastructure, power emanates from there.
It's the same for cloud and AI at large for for example Europe. This is why I am pushing this hash-tag in the data domain.
@spdrnl what I still don’t see is how resources, even with rearranging, will keep up with ever greater production…
@UlrikeHahn Thank you for your question, I indeed did not make this explicit.
The answer is separating storage and indexing.
The author is responsible for obtaining a DOI reference and storing in an online decentralized repository.
Now to indexing.
