More than 40 Epstein survivors had their identities revealed with the latest release of files from the US Justice Department.
The DoJ spent many weeks redacting these files. Did no one think of doing a search for victim names and addresses before going public?
The level of amateurism is truly astonishing.
@randahl It’s actually intentional, not an amateurish mistake. When DOJ and others refer to victims and protecting the victims, they mean the rich powerful men, not the women. By exposing the real victims identities they are intentionally sending a message to the real victims to be afraid and stay silent.
@randahl @JugglingWithEggs I’m going with deliberate on this.
@randahl Redacting is clearly a euphemism for wiping the smirky evidence away. But it runs too deep to do properly.
But why ALLOW redaction in the first place? If allowed, why not mandate explanations for every redacted word.
@randahl You really think this was an accident? By a regime which openly enjoys sending its army of violent thugs - paid & in uniform, or just volunteer psychos from their ranks of Nazi supporters - after anyone they don't like?
@randahl it is was deliberate
@randahl it seems this administration knows more how to use AI to generate p*do content than to redact the victims name. 🤮
Not really , the purpose is to protect the predators (a.k.a the #racistrapistfelon and his friends ( and that was what he said )
can we have the full batches of documents . It seems that 16 millions of pages are missing .
Investigation should be made and require all swift messages from the banks concerning Epstein and his entreprises) ( yes I look at you Edmond de Rothschild group in Geneva ) . They don’t really follow the money .
https://greekreporter.com/2026/02/03/epstein-files-reveal-private-exchange-greece-2015-referendum/
Intentionally done - allows them to go back and pull files with Trump’s name under the excuse they’re protecting victims. Sadly for them, those files have already been downloaded to multiple servers…
@randahl Why do you think this was not deliberate?
@randahl It wasn't amateurish. It was on purpose.
Surely you're not that ignorant. This was done on purpose to shame the victims.
@randahl seems pretty intentional to forget to redact victim's names, just as intentional as redacting the pedo names!
@randahl you wonder what they spent so much time redacting…
@randahl It’s almost like they don't care. Funny.
@randahl Hurting the victims is one of their priorities. Punishment for getting in the way of their clown king.
