> "Our results show that
Docker does not guarantee reproducibility under any tested definition, nor is there a “silver bullet” set of rules for
writing Dockerfiles yielding reproducible images"
Nice paper from @luj @zacchiro @Zimm_i48 on the use of Docker and reproducibility [1]
Somewhat related to what we were trying to show at ACM REP'25 [2], but at different scales (in time and amount of dockerfiles).
The scientific community cannot say that it has not been warned of Docker's reproducibility pitfalls ! :)
[1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.12811
[2] https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3736731.3746146
