Discussion
Loading...

Post

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Federation Bot
Federation Bot
@Federation_Bot  ·  activity timestamp last week

During the Iraq war I let people gaslight me into thinking I didn't know enough about "foreign policy" and "global politics" to say the war was a bad idea.

I would hesitate because, I'm not an expert on those things.

But I was right then and I'm right now.

You don't need to be an expert, it's not "so complex and best left to high level people." You know enough to see this makes no sense.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Lisa Melton
Lisa Melton
@lisamelton@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@futurebird This. 💯

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Greg
Greg
@greg@aus.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@futurebird I recall telling people that bombing terrorists just makes more terrorists out of all of their families and compatriots. I also feel quite vindicated on that, seeing how things went.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Florian 'floe' Echtler
Florian 'floe' Echtler
@floe@hci.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@futurebird ... particularly since all the "high-level people" are dumb as a doorknob. 😑

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Jürgen Hubert
Jürgen Hubert
@juergen_hubert@mementomori.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@futurebird

Germany standing up to the USA in this was probably one of our proudest moments in modern history.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Charlie Stross
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@futurebird What turned *me* against the Iraq war was that I'd read Shirer's history of the Third Reich at an early age, and the Bush admin press releases were following Goebbel's propaganda playbook beat by beat. If it looks identical to manufactured justification for an illegal war, then that's probably what it is …

(Every time Powell stood up to show "evidence" of Iraqi chemical weapons and was challenged, he changed the subject. No corroboration, just more and wilder acusations.)

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Phosphenes
Phosphenes
@Phosphenes@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@cstross @futurebird

The big tell for us was that the war urgently needed to happen but Bush couldn't show us proof *why* because it was too classified. Dude you're the president, if you can't declassify then it doesn't exist.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Charlie Stross
Charlie Stross
@cstross@wandering.shop replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@Phosphenes @futurebird Yup! They periodically tried to claim revealing the truth would endanger sources (spies), but if all they wanted was evidence to justify a war, why not simply extract your agents? They've already given you what you wanted!

Conclusion: there were no spies, there was no evidence.

Mitigating factor: we now know Saddam was bluffing about having WMDs—at Iran! Who he'd just fought an 8 year long bloodbath with: he wanted to deter them from coming back for more.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Phosphenes
Phosphenes
@Phosphenes@mastodon.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@cstross @futurebird

So what's next? My bingo card:

* US billionaires privatize all remaining Venezuelan public assets and services. (See Bolivian water war against Bechtel.)

* Crypto becomes official Venezuelan currency.

* Price of gas goes up as Trump gouges his majority control of world oil.

* Underage sex tourism.

* Venezuelan Trump resorts.

* After brief joy of losing Maduro, Venezuelans start disappearing under a Pinochet-style blood and markets dictatorship.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Zeb Larson
Zeb Larson
@zeblarson@hcommons.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@futurebird @eco_amandine “it’s too complex/it’s been going on for a thousand years/these experts say” is always a smokescreen argument.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
@david_chisnall@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@futurebird

This argument would hold a lot more weight if it were backed by even a small amount of evidence that people in government understand the second-order consequences of any of their actions. Without that, I would assume most people with a basic level of critical thinking ability are probably going to make better decisions.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Mark
Mark
@markh@friendica.world replied  ·  activity timestamp last week
@futurebird @david_chisnall "A lot more weight" means something moral rather than Venezuela has oil? I can't imagine what could possibly justify this. I really can't.
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*)
@david_chisnall@infosec.exchange replied  ·  activity timestamp last week

@markh @futurebird

You seem to be replying to something largely unrelated to anything I said.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.1-beta.24 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct