Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Dare Obasanjo
@carnage4life@mas.to  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

arXiv will no longer accept review articles and position papers unless they have been accepted at a journal or a conference and complete successful peer review.

This is due to being overwhelmed by a hundreds of AI generated papers a month.

Yet another open submission process killed by LLMs.

https://blog.arxiv.org/2025/10/31/attention-authors-updated-practice-for-review-articles-and-position-papers-in-arxiv-cs-category/

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Ross Gayler
@RossGayler@aus.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@carnage4life
What a pain.

I fully agree with the objective of suppressing AI generated slop, but the mechanism of insisting on peer review seems entirely contrary to the point of arXiv being a *preprint* service.

Plus, there is value in the diversity of content in preprints, which gets reduced by standard formats and typical publication venues. Peer review isn't necessarily good at promoting ideas outside the bandwagon-du-jour.

#MetaScience #preprints #PeerReview #publication

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Albert Cardona
@albertcardona@mathstodon.xyz replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 weeks ago

@carnage4life

In the same way that a license is needed to drive a car or own a gun, I can see the utility of a license for using any product labelled as "AI". With a lecture course and exams, like learning to drive a car.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login