Post
I'm not saying "my" article is perfect, in fact the Grokipedia one covers a lot of aspects that I never even got to, meaning it's incredibly long.
Most of my other articles I've written are too niche to earn a Grokipedia article. historical Indonesian communists, klezmer musicians from NY, Soviet Yiddish singers, etc. 馃し
The section on musical modes is the part I struggled with the most in writing the Wikipedia article. Grokipedia's take on it is definitely just word salad which makes me feel a bit better about my difficulties. After plagiarized you still have to synthesize lol. and they made a chart that has the same item on it twice but no human being saw it to realize it.
When it comes down to it, #Wikipedia is a human effort, with an emphasis on improving and review, as this article says. When there are clear errors in the Grokipedia article they're just left in. "Eh, close enough."
https://www.theverge.com/news/807686/elon-musk-grokipedia-launch-wikipedia-xai-copied
And if there was a mechanism to fix things, who would bother to work for free for a bigoted and arrogant trillionaire? I'll stick with the non-profit collective effort, as problematic as it can be.
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate
