Curious Magpie
@CuriousMagpie@beige.party  ·  activity timestamp 19 hours ago
Curious Magpie
@CuriousMagpie@beige.party  ·  activity timestamp 19 hours ago
Pierre-Yves Beaudouin
@Pyb@mamot.fr  ·  activity timestamp yesterday
Pierre-Yves Beaudouin
@Pyb@mamot.fr  ·  activity timestamp yesterday
hypebot boosted
Gernot Wagner
@gwagner@fediscience.org  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago
Role of Media and Advocacy Media coverage of climate change has often emphasized catastrophic scenarios and extreme weather attribution, contributing to heightened public alarm. A 2022 study analyzing English-language news media found a significant reporting bias favoring storms and wildfires, with these events receiving disproportionate attention compared to droughts or other impacts, potentially skewing perceptions of risk materiality.[219] This selective focus aligns with broader trends where outlets attribute unusual weather—such as heat waves, floods, and hurricanes—to anthropogenic climate change, even when causal links remain uncertain or unproven.[220] Such framing has fostered a moral panic, as mainstream reporting routinely overlooks empirical inconsistencies in alarmist predictions, including historical forecast failures like exaggerated sea-level rise or Arctic ice loss timelines.[221] Advocacy organizations, including non-governmental groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Extinction Rebellion, have played a pivotal role in amplifying these narratives through campaigns, protests, and public shaming tactics. These entities mobilize grassroots pressure and influence policy by correlating their activities with shifts in public opinion on global warming, with studies showing moderate positive associations between environmental NGO presence and supportive attitudes.[222]
Role of Media and Advocacy Media coverage of climate change has often emphasized catastrophic scenarios and extreme weather attribution, contributing to heightened public alarm. A 2022 study analyzing English-language news media found a significant reporting bias favoring storms and wildfires, with these events receiving disproportionate attention compared to droughts or other impacts, potentially skewing perceptions of risk materiality.[219] This selective focus aligns with broader trends where outlets attribute unusual weather—such as heat waves, floods, and hurricanes—to anthropogenic climate change, even when causal links remain uncertain or unproven.[220] Such framing has fostered a moral panic, as mainstream reporting routinely overlooks empirical inconsistencies in alarmist predictions, including historical forecast failures like exaggerated sea-level rise or Arctic ice loss timelines.[221] Advocacy organizations, including non-governmental groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Extinction Rebellion, have played a pivotal role in amplifying these narratives through campaigns, protests, and public shaming tactics. These entities mobilize grassroots pressure and influence policy by correlating their activities with shifts in public opinion on global warming, with studies showing moderate positive associations between environmental NGO presence and supportive attitudes.[222]
Role of Media and Advocacy Media coverage of climate change has often emphasized catastrophic scenarios and extreme weather attribution, contributing to heightened public alarm. A 2022 study analyzing English-language news media found a significant reporting bias favoring storms and wildfires, with these events receiving disproportionate attention compared to droughts or other impacts, potentially skewing perceptions of risk materiality.[219] This selective focus aligns with broader trends where outlets attribute unusual weather—such as heat waves, floods, and hurricanes—to anthropogenic climate change, even when causal links remain uncertain or unproven.[220] Such framing has fostered a moral panic, as mainstream reporting routinely overlooks empirical inconsistencies in alarmist predictions, including historical forecast failures like exaggerated sea-level rise or Arctic ice loss timelines.[221] Advocacy organizations, including non-governmental groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Extinction Rebellion, have played a pivotal role in amplifying these narratives through campaigns, protests, and public shaming tactics. These entities mobilize grassroots pressure and influence policy by correlating their activities with shifts in public opinion on global warming, with studies showing moderate positive associations between environmental NGO presence and supportive attitudes.[222]
Gernot Wagner
@gwagner@fediscience.org  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago
Role of Media and Advocacy Media coverage of climate change has often emphasized catastrophic scenarios and extreme weather attribution, contributing to heightened public alarm. A 2022 study analyzing English-language news media found a significant reporting bias favoring storms and wildfires, with these events receiving disproportionate attention compared to droughts or other impacts, potentially skewing perceptions of risk materiality.[219] This selective focus aligns with broader trends where outlets attribute unusual weather—such as heat waves, floods, and hurricanes—to anthropogenic climate change, even when causal links remain uncertain or unproven.[220] Such framing has fostered a moral panic, as mainstream reporting routinely overlooks empirical inconsistencies in alarmist predictions, including historical forecast failures like exaggerated sea-level rise or Arctic ice loss timelines.[221] Advocacy organizations, including non-governmental groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Extinction Rebellion, have played a pivotal role in amplifying these narratives through campaigns, protests, and public shaming tactics. These entities mobilize grassroots pressure and influence policy by correlating their activities with shifts in public opinion on global warming, with studies showing moderate positive associations between environmental NGO presence and supportive attitudes.[222]
Role of Media and Advocacy Media coverage of climate change has often emphasized catastrophic scenarios and extreme weather attribution, contributing to heightened public alarm. A 2022 study analyzing English-language news media found a significant reporting bias favoring storms and wildfires, with these events receiving disproportionate attention compared to droughts or other impacts, potentially skewing perceptions of risk materiality.[219] This selective focus aligns with broader trends where outlets attribute unusual weather—such as heat waves, floods, and hurricanes—to anthropogenic climate change, even when causal links remain uncertain or unproven.[220] Such framing has fostered a moral panic, as mainstream reporting routinely overlooks empirical inconsistencies in alarmist predictions, including historical forecast failures like exaggerated sea-level rise or Arctic ice loss timelines.[221] Advocacy organizations, including non-governmental groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Extinction Rebellion, have played a pivotal role in amplifying these narratives through campaigns, protests, and public shaming tactics. These entities mobilize grassroots pressure and influence policy by correlating their activities with shifts in public opinion on global warming, with studies showing moderate positive associations between environmental NGO presence and supportive attitudes.[222]
Role of Media and Advocacy Media coverage of climate change has often emphasized catastrophic scenarios and extreme weather attribution, contributing to heightened public alarm. A 2022 study analyzing English-language news media found a significant reporting bias favoring storms and wildfires, with these events receiving disproportionate attention compared to droughts or other impacts, potentially skewing perceptions of risk materiality.[219] This selective focus aligns with broader trends where outlets attribute unusual weather—such as heat waves, floods, and hurricanes—to anthropogenic climate change, even when causal links remain uncertain or unproven.[220] Such framing has fostered a moral panic, as mainstream reporting routinely overlooks empirical inconsistencies in alarmist predictions, including historical forecast failures like exaggerated sea-level rise or Arctic ice loss timelines.[221] Advocacy organizations, including non-governmental groups like Greenpeace, Sierra Club, and Extinction Rebellion, have played a pivotal role in amplifying these narratives through campaigns, protests, and public shaming tactics. These entities mobilize grassroots pressure and influence policy by correlating their activities with shifts in public opinion on global warming, with studies showing moderate positive associations between environmental NGO presence and supportive attitudes.[222]
jbz boosted
jbz
@jbz@indieweb.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago
Wikifunctions
@wikifunctions@wikis.world  ·  activity timestamp last week
jbz
@jbz@indieweb.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago
Sascha Pallenberg 🇹🇼 ♻️ ⚡
@pallenberg@mastodon.social  ·  activity timestamp 2 days ago
Dan Carkner🎻
@carkner@klezmor.im  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago
Dan Carkner🎻
@carkner@klezmor.im  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago
petersuber
@petersuber@fediscience.org  ·  activity timestamp 3 days ago
Home Login