Post
#RSpec interactive debugging with #Neovim: I tried a lot, I failed a lot.
I got this working for other languages ( #Python and #CSharp) and it was a HUGE help, taking away one of the main things I need to leave my editor for.
But something is blowing up and I'm still relatively new to Neotest, DAP, and the various plumbing between them and the test runners.
Search query "rails jobs worker"
🦆 Including results for railroad jobs employment
I mean, maybe?
Some updates from the last few days:
#RSpec interactive debugging with #Neovim: I tried a lot, I failed a lot.
I got this working for other languages ( #Python and #CSharp) and it was a HUGE help, taking away one of the main things I need to leave my editor for.
But something is blowing up and I'm still relatively new to Neotest, DAP, and the various plumbing between them and the test runners.
I'm liking how the #RSpec tests are shaping up overall though.
I'd be really interested to get some review from someone with more experience; I did find a few examples of "request" specs (which is the main layer I've decided to start with) around, but there seem to be several different taste preferences going on.
So far, having a "context" for each combination of HTTP verb + endpoint is working out reasonably, and then separate blocks to test unauthenticated / unauthorised / success
One downside of setting myself the stretch goal of "adding #RSPec tests for all URL routes" is that there are a LOT of them 😅
(`rails routes` says 303)
This is of course making this task take forever (~15 hours' work to improve test coverage from ~40% to ~65%).
But, more also-importantly, it's ruining my "lines of code deleted" metric, I have added over 2000 lines of specs alone 🙈
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate
