Begging
Just absolutely BEGGING developers of Linux applications, desktop environments, whatever:
Please recognise that "Liquid Glass" should be treated as a cautionary tale to be avoided
Post
Begging
Just absolutely BEGGING developers of Linux applications, desktop environments, whatever:
Please recognise that "Liquid Glass" should be treated as a cautionary tale to be avoided
anything else is just hubris on the part of the application/etc. developer
Do you want to give your users eye strain?
Because as someone with astigmatism, I'm just looking at screenshots of that bullshit and my head hurts already
Spicy UI take:
I want to be able to easily see the UI elements on my computer so that I can interact with them
Even if I have imperfect eyesight
So like
Opaque buttons and windows and scroll bars of a reasonable size with sharp edges so that my eyes can focus
I don't want the UI elements to disappear or blend in or for whatever is in the background to be visible through them
I need them to be easily visible because my eyes are shit
Thanks
@researchfairy Spicy UI take
A lot of UI design hasn't improved since the 90s Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines and only needs small adjustment to the hardware we use today.
@pnorman I use Xfce with a Mac OS 9 inspired theme
It works
Preach it!
My eyes aren't shit yet and I still want to be able to easily distinguish UI elements because it's a frigging tool not Where's Waldo.
@researchfairy Also, you kids who keep coming up with these crap UIs that can't be used by old people? YOU'RE GOING TO BE OLD TOO. If you're lucky anyway.
@researchfairy I really really want random things to stop moving randomly around too. It gives nausea sometimes and fucks up with spacial awareness 🥲
that "scrollbars of reasonable size" train has long left
as has most of common sense in that regard
…sadly
Granted, I can probably *already* push a string into org.gnome. desktop.ui. scrollbar.minimumwidth and include that in my start-up scripts. But I really don't want to have to do the background learning to implement that.
It's funny really, how the two companies took different user interface paths.
I did use some of them for a couple of months until I went back to basic fvwm2 and similar GUIs. Clear rectangular borders and UI elements, opaque windows and basically a UI which keeps out of my sight.
And I was young and had much better eyes. Eyecandy just gets annoying in a short time.
Apple or designers or whatever: "All those things that make your computer usable? We made them subtle and disappearey and took away the borders and make them slide away unless you mouse over them. They get out of the way of the content you see."
Me: "I need my computer to work on it, I don't just dick around on the internet all day."
@researchfairy have you been using it or just looking at screenshots? I was initially extremely skeptical (and I still have plenty of criticism) but IMHO the screenshots of pathological cases are pretty misleading. (I also have astigmatism, and floaters, and recently some pretty extreme vertigo, so I am primed to be sensitive to such things)
(And you think the astigmatism is bad. Wait until you need progressive lenses.)
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate