Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Jim DeLaHunt
@jdlh@mstdn.ca  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago

Where is the #Fediverse " #handle" syntax, @name@example.com, formally defined? I don't see it in the W3C #ActivityPub spec, nor in #RFC7565, the #Webfinger 'acct' URI scheme spec. Is it a #Mastodon convention which became universal? I am writing software to study handles, and I would rather base it on a spec than a social convention.

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Sebastian Lasse
@sl007@digitalcourage.social replied  ·  activity timestamp 2 months ago
@jdlh

Important question:

For good reasons, it is not part of ActivityPub!

ActivityPub does neither define https as a MUST transport mechanism (you can use it from toaster to toothbrush ot peer-to-peer, via ipfs or whatever) –
nor does it define being webfinger a part of it.
It is in fact a convention.
The workflow is defined in https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/webfinger/

I think it does not promote the Open Web but is ok as an _alternative_ to my own domain.
But e.g. a Public Broadcaster should theoretically only be zdf.social instead of @ZDF

  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
Log in

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.3.13 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login