@Alice

Behold New Mexico!

Lots of rural precincts in the Land of Enchantment are blue. (Except for the southeast sector at the lower right, which is often called "Little Texas" for good(?) reason.)

Those rural blue regions largely correspond to:
https://www.sos.nm.gov/voting-and-elections/native-american-election-information-program/23-nm-federally-recognized-tribes-in-nm-counties/

And we have another entity that only exists along the borderlands:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonia_(United_States) Colonias tend to vote blue, and are considered rural precincts.

https://www.nmfinance.com/colonias/

melioristicmarie@tech.lgbt
lffontenelle@mastodon.social
JessTheUnstill@infosec.exchange
SymTrkl@anarres.family
joelle@social.joelle.us
pattykimura@beige.party
https://universeodon.com/@lucybeahere@mstdn.social
JackPine@ohai.social
albnelson@beige.party
benroyce@mastodon.social
tankgrrl@hachyderm.io
jhavok@mstdn.party
kimlockhartga@beige.party

#Indigenous#NewMexico

@Alice
Any time you view a map, look for the spatial, temporal and density contexts of the statistics being displayed.

This even goes for just regular maps. The state of Kansas appears flat, unless you use a 1 cm contour line...most are 20' or 40' in flat areas and 100' in mountainous. That is an example of the density of statistics. Number of meadow muffins per acre is another...😉

As Mark Twain said "Facts are stubborn, but statistics are more pliable," holds true for maps.🤔