SX Circles of Sustainability.

An adaptation of the model that is more suitable for technology innovation and introduction of new technologies into society. The model removes the #Politics circle and adds an all-pervasive #Technology circle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circles_of_Sustainability

#SX#Sustainability#HarmoniousTechnology#HumaneTechnology

Politics and power dynamics are intricate emergent forces that depend on social context and permeate our social fabric.

“How can you just eliminate the Politics circle?”, one may ask. In FOSS circles there are many who feel that “All tech is political”, or even that everything is political. Politics, or rather power dynamics, are an emergent force. A very nuanced and intricate force that permeates the social fabric of society and has different names that depend on social context, participants and the kind of human activities they are involved in. “Politics” itself can be said to constitute a social construct when adopting the societal perspective of SX, albeit not a very useful one.

By eliminating the circle SX encourages a focus shift that avoids the inevitable negative impact on any discussion once the word “politics” is dropped, and everyone has their own perception of what that entails. The term is too vague, too overloaded, and even weaponised. It’s use has the effect that heels go in the sand, ideologies are brushed up, and arguments prepared for the fight with ‘political opponents’ - instead of coworkers - in fierce, often heated debate. For furtile cocreation a safe and inclusive environment is a requirement. Places where people are stimulated to be creative and open-minded in the discussion of fresh ideas. There is a time and place for constructive political discussion and debate, but politics should not be the default modus operandus that sets tone and culture.
Politics and power dynamics are intricate emergent forces that depend on social context and permeate our social fabric. “How can you just eliminate the Politics circle?”, one may ask. In FOSS circles there are many who feel that “All tech is political”, or even that everything is political. Politics, or rather power dynamics, are an emergent force. A very nuanced and intricate force that permeates the social fabric of society and has different names that depend on social context, participants and the kind of human activities they are involved in. “Politics” itself can be said to constitute a social construct when adopting the societal perspective of SX, albeit not a very useful one. By eliminating the circle SX encourages a focus shift that avoids the inevitable negative impact on any discussion once the word “politics” is dropped, and everyone has their own perception of what that entails. The term is too vague, too overloaded, and even weaponised. It’s use has the effect that heels go in the sand, ideologies are brushed up, and arguments prepared for the fight with ‘political opponents’ - instead of coworkers - in fierce, often heated debate. For furtile cocreation a safe and inclusive environment is a requirement. Places where people are stimulated to be creative and open-minded in the discussion of fresh ideas. There is a time and place for constructive political discussion and debate, but politics should not be the default modus operandus that sets tone and culture.
Diagram showing the revised version of the Circles of Sustainability model as SX defines it. Three circles overlap each other in a Venn diagram with the sweet spot in the center. These represent Culture, Ecology and Economics. Surrounding all three circles is the fourth circle of Technology.
Diagram showing the revised version of the Circles of Sustainability model as SX defines it. Three circles overlap each other in a Venn diagram with the sweet spot in the center. These represent Culture, Ecology and Economics. Surrounding all three circles is the fourth circle of Technology.
@smallcircles thanks for sharing the source and your adaptation.
1. Since technology is an outcome of ecology, economics & culture, it would not bound them in a super set but is an intersecting subset I.e. technology = ecology ⋂ economics ⋂ culture.
2. By removing “politics & power dynamics” you have simplified & ignored a key component of decision making for sustainability e.g. we haven’t abandoned fossil fuel for more environmentally sustaining alternatives because of global power dynamics.
@dahukanna you are not wrong. This model has specific scope and purpose: cocreation in grassroots commons.

Politics is explicitly not ignored, but acknowledged and considered at every level in how it rears up its head. SX is founded and has as starting point at a most personal perspective where every participant counts as stakeholder in a solution whose needs are taken into account. This is where it addresses things like inclusion, among others.

@dahukanna I value your feedback just as much. 🤗

As for the other circles and the pervasive role of Technology in this model.

The pervasive role is an observation of the current society we live in, a technosphere or technocracy. Everything we do depends on global high-tech supply lines. A society where we literally clamor for digital transformation in hopes of coping with all the tech.

SX is focused on shifting that role. Tech is a given, solutions that satisfy people's needs get main focus.

@dahukanna

Regarding the pervasive Tech circle, consider this..

If you're an office clerk, your job may be entirely defined by the software that runs on your desktop. You are allowed to live further from work by super advanced driving machines (which somehow have become drenched with surveillance technology), and at home first thing you do is turn on the smart TV (which surveils you, same as your IoT Bosch washing machine) and drink a Red Bull that needed several chemical plants to produce it.

1+ more replies (not shown)
@dahukanna

Starting at personal perspective, working through inter-personal relationships, to finally consider the complex social construct that are thus formed in what we call society. Power dynamics is in every fibre of the social fabric, working its subtle ways and must be understood in all its nuance when modeling solutions.

It's just not named "politics". Do we think that US Republicans and Democrats could cocreate software together on the basis of bipartisan politics?

@dahukanna

Using that particular context is not a useful vantage point for solution design. Generally speaking "Politics" as a label that is liberally slapped around by anyone who has an agenda is not conducive to create an environment and atmosphere where people should be coworkers freely able to finding solutions to wicked problems.

As the text mentions, there's are appropriate time for constructive political discussion and debate. But not everything is politics. Life itself is not politics.

@smallcircles I would argue that life is political as long as there are hierarchical and patriarchal power dynamics. I have to consider how I navigate them every waking hour or without cause most people could have any number of actions taken against them e.g. In most western countries, I’m automatically assumed to be a refugee, engaged in some kind of nefarious activity or cognitively limited because of biological melanin levels.
@dahukanna

I get that, and I agree with what we want to achieve by saying that too. It is just a very bleak outlook on life, if we'd make that the going terminology and language in which we socially interacted with each other all of the time.

"Son, you were born now. Know that it was a political act, a deal between me and your mother. You came forth and are now also member of the party, and we expect you to subscribe to and spread our ideology. So long as you do, we cover each others backs."

1 more replies (not shown)