SX Circles of Sustainability.
An adaptation of the model that is more suitable for technology innovation and introduction of new technologies into society. The model removes the #Politics circle and adds an all-pervasive #Technology circle.


SX Circles of Sustainability.
An adaptation of the model that is more suitable for technology innovation and introduction of new technologies into society. The model removes the #Politics circle and adds an all-pervasive #Technology circle.
Politics is explicitly not ignored, but acknowledged and considered at every level in how it rears up its head. SX is founded and has as starting point at a most personal perspective where every participant counts as stakeholder in a solution whose needs are taken into account. This is where it addresses things like inclusion, among others.
@dahukanna I value your feedback just as much. 🤗
As for the other circles and the pervasive role of Technology in this model.
The pervasive role is an observation of the current society we live in, a technosphere or technocracy. Everything we do depends on global high-tech supply lines. A society where we literally clamor for digital transformation in hopes of coping with all the tech.
SX is focused on shifting that role. Tech is a given, solutions that satisfy people's needs get main focus.
Regarding the pervasive Tech circle, consider this..
If you're an office clerk, your job may be entirely defined by the software that runs on your desktop. You are allowed to live further from work by super advanced driving machines (which somehow have become drenched with surveillance technology), and at home first thing you do is turn on the smart TV (which surveils you, same as your IoT Bosch washing machine) and drink a Red Bull that needed several chemical plants to produce it.
And then I did not even mention AI yet, where many 1,000's of people talking full-time about Responsible and Ethical AI could not avoid that it was nonetheless mindlessly dumped into society at scale and breakneck speed, and damn the consequences. 😬
Starting at personal perspective, working through inter-personal relationships, to finally consider the complex social construct that are thus formed in what we call society. Power dynamics is in every fibre of the social fabric, working its subtle ways and must be understood in all its nuance when modeling solutions.
It's just not named "politics". Do we think that US Republicans and Democrats could cocreate software together on the basis of bipartisan politics?
Using that particular context is not a useful vantage point for solution design. Generally speaking "Politics" as a label that is liberally slapped around by anyone who has an agenda is not conducive to create an environment and atmosphere where people should be coworkers freely able to finding solutions to wicked problems.
As the text mentions, there's are appropriate time for constructive political discussion and debate. But not everything is politics. Life itself is not politics.
I get that, and I agree with what we want to achieve by saying that too. It is just a very bleak outlook on life, if we'd make that the going terminology and language in which we socially interacted with each other all of the time.
"Son, you were born now. Know that it was a political act, a deal between me and your mother. You came forth and are now also member of the party, and we expect you to subscribe to and spread our ideology. So long as you do, we cover each others backs."
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate