You can now disable all AI features in nano
You can now disable all AI features in nano
You can now disable all AI features in ed
emacs, unfortunately, still comes with `doctor`
In seriousness,, @suetanvil, it's important to note this. LLM-backed generative AI ballyhoo neglects the fact that Eliza was passing Turing tests (at least, on occasion) before most of us were born.
We're not in the midst of some AI revolution that changes the face of computing. The subfield reached a plateau recently — which has limited uses — except as a capitalist fad, that is — those uses are boundless indeed.
&, @jmax, I can't keep playing M-x doctor b/c my compiles are faster these days!
I'm sure M-x doctor would conclude:
“I think your wasteful overuse of electricity & disk space to implement something that is barely better than my 1,625 lines of Elisp has something to do with your problems.”
If that were true, browsing the web with M-x eww would also get me into a lot of trouble I'd think
Regardless, I don't advise doing it anyway :P
Under v3, it's surely a violation,
@cwebber.
GPLv3 group is unique among #copyleft licenses in that “modify” is defined:
> ”To ‘modify’ a work means to copy from or adapt all or part of the work in a fashion requiring copyright permission”
If you need copyright permission to add the REST API calls (which of course you do), then GPLv3§12 kicks in immediately if Chatgpt's license or ToS or TaC in any way contradict GPLv3's terms.
Bob's your uncle & you violat copyleft.
Cc: @suetanvil @jmax
I'd think that Emacs code which made http calls to ChatGPT's web interface would fall under Freedom Zero, though ChatGPTs TOS is another thing and not something I can really be bothered with.
There *are* models that will run on a desktop PC, so it's not impossible to DIY that end of things either.
Not that there's any value to it, but I kind of like the symmetry of stupid involved in something like this.
I'm sure M-x doctor would conclude:
“I think your wasteful overuse of electricity & disk space to implement something that is barely better than my 1,625 lines of Elisp has something to do with your problems.”
In seriousness,, @suetanvil, it's important to note this. LLM-backed generative AI ballyhoo neglects the fact that Eliza was passing Turing tests (at least, on occasion) before most of us were born.
We're not in the midst of some AI revolution that changes the face of computing. The subfield reached a plateau recently — which has limited uses — except as a capitalist fad, that is — those uses are boundless indeed.
&, @jmax, I can't keep playing M-x doctor b/c my compiles are faster these days!
and just like the finest largle langle mangles of our day, ed will not even remotely understand what you want!
❯ ed
vibe code for me please
?
make my code good
?
please i don't know how to program
?
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate