{"position": 17, "domain_name": "example.com", "date": "2025-07-11"}
And the list is unbelievable: no porn!
DoH is harmful to the Internet and harmful to society.
1) DoT has almost the same properties (but people keep FUDing about DoH only)
2) malware can implement its own name resolution system, whether or not DoH exists.
3) As long as there are networks which block port 53 and force going through their resolver, we'll need DoT and DoH.
2) So your stance is that a piece of software which bypasses user *and* administrator control in order to surveil or upload data is not malicious?
Example: Firefox defaults!
3) If you have the capability to block 53 and 853, you can just as easily block DoH. DoH is ineffective for fascist bypass.
If that domain is in the context of hamradio, which I believe it is, then ON is Belgium :)
A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate