Post · bonfire.cafe

@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social · 4 weeks ago

🇩🇪🚨Unter dänischer Führung soll die #Chatkontrolle schon am 14. Oktober beschlossen werden! https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVIII/EU/26599/imfname_11492795.pdf (S. 31)

Entscheidend ist Deutschland: Weder Union noch SPD haben digitales Briefgeheimnis und sichere Verschlüsselung bisher zur roten Linie erklärt...

Truls

@truls46@mastodon.social · 3 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Wer Menschenrechte auf die gleiche Stufe wie eine Zirkusvorstellung stellt, von dem kann man nicht erwarten, dass er #Privatsphäre und #Datenschutz als wichtig erachtet.

Im Gegenteil, für #Merz sind Datenschützer vermutlich alles "linke Spinner die nicht mehr alle Tassen im Schrank haben".

Björn-Lars Kuhn ☠️:nona:

@Proteus@troet.cafe · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer
rote Linien sind oft nur mit Kreide gemalt ...

Saupreiss #Präparat500

@Saupreiss@pfalz.social · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Die SPR? Srsly? 😂

Underfaker

@Underfaker@mastodon.social · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer

Union und SPD... Da kann ich nur lachen. Die sind doch scharf darauf.
Wilde Vorstellung, die könnten das kritisch sehen

Ubahn fahn

@x2ero@ieji.de · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Die geben nicht auf wie?

Patrick Breyer

@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social · 4 weeks ago

🇬🇧🚨 Under Danish leadership, #ChatControl is to be adopted as early as October 14! https://www.parlament.gv.at/dokument/XXVIII/EU/26599/imfname_11492795.pdf (p. 31)

The decisive factor is Germany: neither Conservatives nor Socialists have yet declared digital privacy of correspondence and secure encryption to be a red line.

Rasmus Lindegaard

@rasmus91@fosstodon.org · 3 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer nooooo

elgregor@social.librem.one

@elgregor@social.librem.one · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Please, just let it die. Politicians can spy on their own communications if they want to. Leave ours alone.

ScoTTY

@sco_tty@mastodon.social · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer I somehow cannot look at SPD being translated as Socialists even though the S in their name sort of suggests that.
To readers not familiar with German politics: They are a center-left party and given their domestic politics from the last few years i wouldnt be surprised to see them actively supporting #chatcontrol. The Green and Left parties in our parliament would oppose it but are not part of the government coalition and even combined with SPD they wouldnt have a majority

scvalex

@scvalex@mas.to · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Is adopted the right word here? Doesn't it have to go through a EU Parliament vote? (And also a Council vote, but presumably they negotiate that before introducing it to Parliament.)

Patrick Breyer

@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social · 4 weeks ago

@scvalex Technically they want the Council to adopt a general approach, i.e. a position on the proposal, so that trilogue negotiations can begin.

scvalex

@scvalex@mas.to · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Ah, ok. Thanks. So, less "adopted" and more "seriously consider it"?

johnrohde

@johnrohde@helvede.net · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer @cryptohagen The current Danish government is obsessed with surveillance so I’m not surprised. They claim surveillance brings safety and freedom. George Orvell may disagree.

Blake C. Stacey

@bstacey@icosahedron.website · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Can someone translate what "legislative deliberations" of the "Justice and Home Affairs Council" means in any language that's not EU-speak?

Alex

@o_O@mastodon.nu · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer Who would’ve thought they'd actually follow through with it??
https://youtube.com/watch?v=WvAEp0e0Qy8

Jaime Herazo

@jherazob@mastodon.ie · 4 weeks ago

@echo_pbreyer
Here we go again...

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances

Bonfire social · 1.0.0-rc.2.3 no JS en

Automatic federation enabled