Discussion
Loading...

#Tag

Log in
  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
CAA SSLA
CAA SSLA
@CAA_SSLA@archaeo.social  ·  activity timestamp 4 weeks ago

🐾 A roadmap is a documented plan of action that structures future work. Having a checklist of things to do (and already done!) can help garner momentum while also making your plans more transparent for prospective users.

Roadmaps should document what features are planned over short- and long-term, outline what steps need to be taken to achieve these goals, and delegate/credit work to specific individuals.

#DigiArchMaintainathon #DigitalArchaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Maintainathon

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
STOP OCCUPATION 🍉 S. Costa boosted
CAA SSLA
CAA SSLA
@CAA_SSLA@archaeo.social  ·  activity timestamp last month

✨ The Journal of Open Source Software @joss is a great venue for writing a software review. They tend to focus on technical aspects, but if you prefer to focus on application-oriented feedback, Archäologische Informationen (https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/arch-inf) is happy to take software reviews.

Take a look here for a small example: https://doi.org/10.11588/ai.2022.1.95272

#DigiArchMaintainathon #DigitalArchaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Maintainathon

Software Review for the Software PointSamplingTool
| Archäologische Informationen
Archäologische Informationen
Archäologische Informationen
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
CAA SSLA
CAA SSLA
@CAA_SSLA@archaeo.social  ·  activity timestamp last month

✨ Code reviews are constructive, arms length commentary on published research software. In addition to providing structured feedback to maintainers, they help raise awareness of a tool. This is a win-win for developers and users alike!

#DigiArchMaintainathon #DigitalArchaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Maintainathon

CAA SSLA
CAA SSLA
@CAA_SSLA@archaeo.social replied  ·  activity timestamp last month

✨ The Journal of Open Source Software @joss is a great venue for writing a software review. They tend to focus on technical aspects, but if you prefer to focus on application-oriented feedback, Archäologische Informationen (https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/arch-inf) is happy to take software reviews.

Take a look here for a small example: https://doi.org/10.11588/ai.2022.1.95272

#DigiArchMaintainathon #DigitalArchaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Maintainathon

Software Review for the Software PointSamplingTool
| Archäologische Informationen
Archäologische Informationen
Archäologische Informationen
  • Copy link
  • Flag this comment
  • Block
CAA SSLA
CAA SSLA
@CAA_SSLA@archaeo.social  ·  activity timestamp last month

✨ Code reviews are constructive, arms length commentary on published research software. In addition to providing structured feedback to maintainers, they help raise awareness of a tool. This is a win-win for developers and users alike!

#DigiArchMaintainathon #DigitalArchaeology #ComputationalArchaeology #Maintainathon

  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block

bonfire.cafe

A space for Bonfire maintainers and contributors to communicate

bonfire.cafe: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.2-alpha.27 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
Log in
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct