My first time ever on this list 馃槈 . While I don't like gamification, it is certainly something I couldn't miss today when cleaning tabs.
My first time ever on this list 馃槈 . While I don't like gamification, it is certainly something I couldn't miss today when cleaning tabs.
I share this sentiment @nanopub
https://w3id.org/np/RAiFdv4D_zW85xY3e00XaxetTe2FQSt3nYzbuONj5TJ6M
Just, I don't think replying with another #nanopub is the way to go in a discussion. Right? And then: perhaps it is a good idea for space No.27 to work on an action plan? 馃槈
@tkuhn perhaps, I should do a few #nanopub onboarding sessions embedded with my planned #Snakemake Hackathon and the Snakemake implementation for nanopubs in a workshop (for which I still need to do some work) next year.
I'm not sure, I followed you with your remark - is this better? https://w3id.org/np/RAADhF-xHWOeATa1pKZelZ2Jwbpjxrxn8Md-yKVRxdHho
I am going! 馃コ
(Of course, I still need permission and put some work in an overhaul for this talk (content and layout), but other than that ...)
@Dutch_Reproducibility_Network
In fact, I am a #Snakemake co-maintainer and teacher. I was not aware of WorkflowHub - and that was an omission on my part. We actually support and favour this kind of registration: https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/en/stable/snakefiles/deployment.html#uploading-workflows-to-workflowhub
In my original post, I also neglected to mention the integration of WorkflowHub with #RO-Crate and in turn, the integration of RO-Crates with nanopubs. I am actively working on a better support for #nanopub and RO-Crates with @fbartusch. The question, how I teach that stands: The #HPC world (at least my bubble) is not really supportive for #ReproducibleComputing . All #OpenScience shenanigans are frowned upon. And PIs in my vicinity are still on this level: https://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1531 - so, how do we educate the educators?
I share this sentiment @nanopub
https://w3id.org/np/RAiFdv4D_zW85xY3e00XaxetTe2FQSt3nYzbuONj5TJ6M
Just, I don't think replying with another #nanopub is the way to go in a discussion. Right? And then: perhaps it is a good idea for space No.27 to work on an action plan? 馃槈
Just a minute ago, I accidentally discovered Workflowhub (https://about.workflowhub.eu/) when browsing through a few Nanopubs. I was not aware of this repository.
A first thought: "Yet another repository to register #FAIR materials? Seriously?" Then again, I am all in favour of #reproducibleComputing and want to see more of it.
On the other hand: transparency in our work is central to the #OpenScience idea. NOT cluttering a file space so that we can be transparent in our work is paramount.
Lately, we have seen #nanopub, #ROcrates, and apparently WorkflowHub, too. (This is by no means a comprehensive list.) I wonder: Are we getting too many solutions to keep up-to-date? Are we risking frightening young researchers with the high standards we are setting? We are by no means where we want to be in terms of #transparency and #reproducibility in research, or are we?
Note, that I understand how competing systems and tool sets arise. Still, my nonrhetorical questions (1 & 2) stand.
