According to The Epstein Transparency Act, the Department of Justice can ONLY redact names and faces of victims or withhold child sexual abuse material.
And so they released more files. But what they overlooked is, some of the documents have already been released, and by comparison we can now see how they have redacted the files:
Picture 1: Document previously released in 2024.
Picture 2: The same document, but now with Trump's name redacted, as released recently by the DoJ.
THIS IS ILLEGAL.
@randahl
Apparently some of the redactions can be removed by copying text and then pasting it into notepad.
Wondering if this is referring to the same 2 documents?
NB, the preview shows the webpage ... the link however ... goes to a CORRECTION.
The most ridiculous part is that now Trump is hiding behind Bill Clinton.
@randahl There's a saying in jurisprudence that laws that aren't enforced don't exist. That's the case here. Sure, it's illegal. But who will enforce that law? If it's not enforced, then it doesn't matter if it's illegal or not.
We've seen the GOP roll over completely for this regime, even bending the law itself for them. There IS no law in the US right now, in the canonical sense.
@randahl No government should ever redact, obscure, delay or anything else to documents that needed to be seen by the public.
@randahl guessing DOJ decided it was up to them to determine the credibility of Sarah Ransome and having deemed her not credible thought that was sufficient justification for not following the law.
@randahl No one cares, if its illegal!
Trump is on the list after all. He's a Jesuit who's a member of Chabad (thank Kushner for it). It's clear as day that Trump is being covered for.
We know for a fact he also banged two young boys, one who was 8, and another 11 at the time. Those families were settled, likely blackmailed never to talk about it.
@randahl I knew DOJ's official confidential opinion is that Donald Trump is a victim, but Sergy and his then fiance too?
“...several girls at any one time. She confided in me about her casual ‘friendship’ with Donald. Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples’. Donald Trump liked flicking and sucking her nipples until they were raw. One evening when we were showering together, she showed me her nipples. They looked incredibly painful as they were red and swollen and I remember...
(1/3)
@randahl
@randahl when trump is redacted, does it mean he was a victim or …..
@randahl The Executive branch has corrupted the Judicial branch. Is all of Washington DC in on it? Protecting a bunch of pedophiles. Are they themselves the pedophiles. So next time FBI announce more arrests of child predators what they really do is set up a smoke screen of doing their jobs. They don't go after the producers of the CSAM but people who download it.
Why would the US government go so far to protect the names of powerful people? Out of kindness of their hearts?
@randahl law. In the US. LOL :SadFace
Codename: Pert Nipples!
@randahl
Continuing the work of the stupid and incompetent or is someone on the inside tipping us off?
@randahl It was guranteed they wouldn't out Trump with that victim language. The manchild is a professional victim. So easy for him to Roy Cohn redactions for himself given all his sycophants in congress. Told people this is how it would shake out when the deal was struck. I'm really just surprised anyone is surprised.
@randahl Not saying we give up, but I don’t know where this goes from here.
This coverup is *shameless*.
@randahl Unless DJT is claiming that "he is a victim".
@randahl fascinating excercise in authoritarian ass-covering
@randahl well done to the people at DOJ that spent hundreds/thousands of hours making this happen and have kept their mouths shut. Happy holidays, sure that must rest easy in the conscience. Probably really helps hearing Trump & republicans lie about it post hoc 👊 🇺🇸 🔥
@randahl Except DOJ could give a shit if it's legal, they are the enforcement arm of the the fascist party, fat donnie's legal gestapo...with no guardrails
@randahl Thank you for staying on this story.
@randahl Well...maybe Trump is a victim of his urges so his name was redacted?
@randahl Apparently there was a lot of of child sexual abuse, and/or a lot of victims, and donald's name is in the middle of all of it.
@randahl so we should we just assume that every perpetrator that was blacked out was Trump?
@randahl
Reminds me of the Mueller report which Trumpolini claimed absolved him of any connection to the Russians. Of course it did as long as the report remained heavily redacted.
@randahl "The truth is, these are not very bright guys, and things got out of hand,"
#EpsteinFiles #Epstein #JeffreyEpstein #Trump #WhiteHouse #USPOL #USPOLITICS #EpsteinTransparencyAct #DeepThroat #Watergate #GOP
@randahl nicely caught! Well that sums up nicely what everyone knew was going to happen even before they revealed it. The fact they did exactly what we suspected they would - and poorly - is almost unbelievable. Almost.
@randahl
Nonono, you see, the whole Epstein case is a democrat conspiracy, so Trump is a victim.
(and this is why lawyers spend the first 12 pages of a contract on definitions).
@randahl Surprise, surprise! 🤡
@randahl After seeing how much is redacted from so few documents, I'm starting to think this is a massive conspiracy to keep laserjet and inkjet blank toner refill companies in business 🤬
@randahl whoever thought he is not the most dispicable dirtbag walking freely is clearly lobotomized.
@randahl If we were a country that respected the rule of law, that might matter.
Unbelievable bunch of evil incompetent amateurs…
Trump is guilty as hell. And it is no surprise at all…
@randahl The one good thing about this administration is that they're so incompetent, that even their corruption is done incompetently. This would be funny if it wasn't so harmful.
@randahl Good stuff, great find. Re-redacted. This happens when sheer volume busts attempts to cover up. Great to see this kind of physical proof of their tinkering/tampering. Interesting that Donald's appreciation for a victim's nipples had escaped redaction efforts in the first place. Important to know, since he's denied every- and anything. Confirmed lies, then.
How many FBI staff were sent to NYC for how many weeks to review (and redact) Agent Orange out of his mess?
@randahl this administration has clearly stated, and shown in their behavior, that they consider themselves above the law. Trump is directly responsible for and guilty of murder and rape, so do you think he or his army of maggots care at all about censoring these files?
@randahl
It reminds me Crofton Black works with reverse engineering CIA redacted files. I mean finding a way through vocabulary, length of redacted parts, font used, language and acronyms, to fill the gap between what you can read and what is 'invisible'.
https://exposingtheinvisible.org/en/articles/how-do-we-know-things/
@randahl No, you see, Trump is the victim here, so he demanded they remove his name.
I’m being both extremely sarcastic and convinced I’m very close to the truth.
Sources:
The first unredacted version released in 2024:
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf
The new Pam Bondi DoJ version where Trump's name is redacted:
https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1296-17.pdf
Maybe, just maybe, we're looking at this all wrong!
Hear me out...
Maybe Trump's name is redacted because he is a victim!
Could Trump have been repeatedly raped and sodomized by Jeffrey Epstein and Epstein's powerful billionaire clients?
- How many times was Trump assaulted?
- How many of his body cavities were violated by his abusers?
- Were Trump's nipples flicked and sucked until they were raw?
:)
@randahl Wow.
They’re so evil, and they’re so fucking incompetent. I guess yay on the latter.
