By Lainey Molnar 🥂🐈
First year chem is doing conversions work today, mainly mol <-> mass <-> particle ratios.
Comp sci touched their first HTML yesterday. They gave semantic structure to a recipe. The "woah" moment between seeing it typed and seeing it rendered on the page was a big one for most students. We'll do more today.
AP Chem is moving into reaction stoichiometry.
Warum die #noAfD die #Justiz in den #ostdeutschen #Bundesländern relativ leicht und nachhaltig unterwandern könnte:
Nach der #Wende wurden gleichzeitig sehr viele (westdeutsche) Bewerber*innen als #Richter*innen und Staatsanwält*innen im Osten eingestellt. Diese gehen in den kommenden Jahren in großer Zahl in den #Ruhestand. In einigen ostdeutschen Bundesländern werden das mehr als 50% der jeweiligen Berufsgruppe in den nächsten 5 Jahren sein.
Die #noAfD hat der #Unabhängigkeit der Justiz den Kampf angesagt. Das schreckt mögliche Bewerber*innen mit demokratischer, rechtsstaatlicher Überzeugung ab. In dem Klima möchten anständige Menschen eher nicht arbeiten. Dies höre ich von vielen Kolleg*innen.
Damit wird sich der #Bewerbermangel im Osten verschärfen. Das ermöglicht einem noAfD-#Justizminister, die Eingangsvoraussetzungen abzusenken und eigene Gefolgsleute in großer Zahl einzustellen. Wenn die noAfd die entsprechenden Gremien (#Richterwahlausschüsse) dominiert, wird das auch niemand kontrollieren oder gar verhindern können.
Das Ergebnis: eine im Kern zunehmend rechtsstaatsfeindliche Justiz und eine nachhaltige Schwächung des Rechtsstaats.
Das macht mir Angst.
Today's threads (a thread)
Inside: Anti-vax/anti-trust; and more!
Archived at: https://pluralistic.net/2026/09/09/when-it-dont-rain/
1/
Darum steht der Null-Euro-Samstag in Mainz vor dem Aus
Der Null-Euro-Samstag in Mainz steht auf der Kippe. Laut Stadtverwaltung hat das Angebot keine neuen Dauerkunden für Bus und Bahn gewonnen und ist angesichts des Millionendefizits nicht mehr tragbar.
The route to the Clay problem through a smooth force, options c and d in Fefferman’s statement of the problem, is the route Luis and Diego opened and the one Levent and I had quietly chosen to attack. Almost nobody else I know of was working on it. It is not the direction one arrives at in a few days by giving a model the problem statement. When I heard “forced,” it was a bright red flag. [...]
Levent had been told by Sebastien “very little human input” had been used. This turned out not to be true. Over the course of the call, as members of their team sent Sebastien corrections and details over their internal chat, it emerged that an entire team had been working on the problem, that this was one of a number of things that was tried [...]
I asked when the first prompt had been sent by them. This question was not answered directly by OpenAI for some time. Eventually it was agreed that it had been sent in the past few days, after information about our work had reached OpenAI
I asked whether the model had been trained on, or had access to, our sessions in Codex, into which we had been putting all our drafts for the whole of this project. I was told the model did not look up user data. I asked again, about training, and I did not get an answer [...]
I said that if OpenAI released its result in the way proposed I would go public with what happened. The reply was, “Why would you ruin your career?” I replied that I am an academic, and asked why he thought going public would ruin my career. The reply was, “If you don’t want me to be nice, then I don’t have to be nice.”
Well there's the shoe dropped: the terms of service have always allowed openAI to use your data essentially however they please, and apparently they will in fact use it to steal your work.
Just checking I understand US politics:
There are protests called 'no kings'. And these oppose a President acting like a king.
There is a party whose name literally means 'people who are opposed to having a king'.
And this party is objecting to the protests?
Trump’s Super PAC Is Tied to Mystery Group Spending $25 Million on Midterms
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/09/us/politics/trump-midterms-maga-inc-spending.html?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypub
Posted into U.S. @u-s-newyorktimes
Writing a shopping list and autocorrect helpfully suggested replacing fennel with fentanyl.
@damonism look it’s not wrong…
Trump keeps expanding his trade war with Canada.
Instead of letting Trump bully smaller countries one by one, we need a pact of mutual support.
When Trump puts tariffs on Canada, not only Canada should retaliate — all the Democratic countries should put retaliatory tariffs on the US.
One for all. All for one. ⚔️
@randahl I’m all for solidarity, but doesn’t tariffs for America mean hard times for Americans? I need convincing that this isn’t one of his objectives.
Heeey, the tears of joy thing—do you suppose this is a Trump tell? That all the manly-men constantly thanking him with tears in their eyes are weeping because HE LAID HIS BRAIN SLUG BABIES ON THEIR HEADS?
@cstross True in the metaphorical sense.
anyway, yea, markets are tools for efficiently allocating resources
Markets are tools for efficiently allocating resources, but with some very important caveats:
- They must be properly regulated to incentivise the desired outcomes. Otherwise, they are optimising for something very efficiently, but it’s not likely to be the thing you want.
- Markets do not perform well where you have information asymmetry. When ‘AI’ companies can outright lie about their products and the press unconditionally repeats those lies, you have too much information asymmetry for markets to work well.
- Markets rely on aggregate behaviour of a large number of participates making independent decisions. If wealth is too concentrated then they don’t functioning market, you have a centrally managed economy run by a handful of oligarchs.
- Free markets are not a stable state, they need constant intervention to remain free markets.
I wish more free-market fanboys in politics understood how markets actually work. They can be amazing tools but few machines work well if you remove their regulators.
@david_chisnall @SnoopJ I'm reminded of a point someone (was it @HalvarFlake ?) made about specialized vs. generalized hardware, where specialized hardware will always be more efficient to do the task, but the added overhead of getting there vs. just using whatever is general purpose and on the shelf just doesn't make it worth it.
Having a giant "do the thing inefficiently with zero preparatory overhead" can be useful if whatever it is that's required for preparation is scarce. And apparently it is, or we'd be doing the other thing
Writing a shopping list and autocorrect helpfully suggested replacing fennel with fentanyl.
Die Grenzkrise von Ceuta bringt Pedro Sánchez in Bedrängnis: innenpolitisch, außenpolitisch und innerhalb der Regierung. Warum Ceuta ein echtes Problem für das moralische Selbstverständnis der spanischen Linksregierung ist, beleuchtet Julia Macher: www.blaetter.de/ausgabe/2026/september/geopferte-humanitaet-spanien-nach-ceuta
Publication day! Our finalised paper on melange processes at Greenland glacier fronts and what it means for calving glacier stability is finally out...
If you want to know what I've been doing in #Greenland the last few years, why it is so important and what conclusions we have drawn, I've written a hopefully easy to follow summary here:
Am I expecting too much? I did after all reassemble a mac mini on my desk between reaction set-ups today. Not to say I'm any good at this stuff, but I can at least find our torx screw drivers and know to keep my screws in little containers.
Also, and perhaps a more important thing: how do I convey to students not just "here is the solution to the problem in front of us" but "here is how you want to think about these problems". Because I think knowing how to think about fixing this kind of thing does directly translate to being good at improvising stuff in experiments as necessary. Is it a matter of just explaining that they should think of it as part of their work?
Catalans a la llista secreta de Marlaska: qui són i com els classifica Interior
El dossier revelat per 'El Confidencial' perfila 280 tertulians i els etiqueta per ideologia i actitud davant de l'executiu
https://shorturl.at/uBVIB
Hello,
Une nouvelle venue ce soir ? Ou bien elle n'ose pas encore ?
Parce que je sens que ta nouvelle collègue n'a encore rien vu 🤣
@nartagnan
ha ha oui elle est là
😍
Any phone can be a folding phone if you fold it hard enough.
@neil once
Wo kriegt man Milliarden her?
Hier: 28,5 Milliarden aus illegalen #CumCum Steuermaschen könnten die Bundesländer zurückholen. Es ist sowieso ihre Aufgabe. Die Werkzeuge sind da.