@mttaggart it is hard to talk about because the origin point for all their usage is still “language”. they write so many prompts. so many agents dot em dee. but it is … debased, somehow. the kind of thinking that goes into a prompt is distorted and bizarre. flaccid, careless, the perverse approximation of language that you get out of a chatbot is a strangely fitting reward for the perverse approximation of language you put in
@glyph With whom does the user converse with the prompt? What do they receive back? How can it be anything nourishing? And over time, what happens to the mind that speaks mostly to the thoughtless machine?