@sharpcheddargoblin It's not a given, but yes, the risk is quite high. Tech is generally not political, and there are open models that can do things like code analyzing with "somewhat ok" resource use. But I sadly do not think that is what GrapheneOS is talking about.
To compare with git, using git for your project does not need to mean you support bad people, but the moment you pay money to github, you do.
And it does not really matter if AI is used to produce code or not, what matters in this setting is the cost, and who gets the money.
The cost of this must be taken from donations.
The best bet is that this money ends up with Microsoft, with Anthropic and OpenAI as "close contenders".
Graphene could be open about this. What LLMs are used? What is the cost and who gets our donations?
Already, it is sad to see GrapheneOS be on Github, especially if it involves any financial cost, but I understand it is hard to leave.
But to pay for their LLMs is highly unethical.
@GrapheneOS @aphedges @paulshryock