@dthompson gives a good comment on the two different views of "p2p":
> There's a distinction to be made between p2p as a network topology and p2p as a redistribution of power and agency. It's true that relays are an unsatisfying fallback to deal with the networks we have, but they still allow for meaningful p2p in sociopolitical terms. Relays that support the spirit of p2p need to be federated, stateless, and end-to-end encrypted.
Tor Onion Services for instance are also relay'ed (as is pretty much all internet traffic) but pretty much nobody blinks at them being called P2P because they provide the assurances around agency and abstraction enabling P2P interactions.